Environmental Threats & tips 3


Hoping to have new website up with page archives very soon for each page category! posted Mar 21/17

Subject: How Uranium Becomes Nuclear Fuel posted May 16/17

 Here’s a 5 min. lesson that 99.9% of the population doesn’t understand,  just the basic process to create the most deadly source of electricity ever developed,,,,, how can the powers that be , be so fu%$$$$ stupid ,,,,,, cause nobody knows ,  so nobody cares !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Published on May 2, 2015
Nuclear technology is constantly in the news. So how exactly do you make nuclear fuel?

Update 2017-05-12 MAJOR CYBER-ATTACK HITS AT LEAST 74 COUNTRIES posted May 14/17

1)    In the UK a large majority of businesses express concern about security of the electrical grid and data given the vulnerability of devices like smeters.

UK firms ‘concerned about cyber-attacks on new energy tech’

“Around two-thirds (65%) of UK businesses are concerned about cyber-attacks as new technologies like smart meters are being installed.

According to a new PwC survey, 51% of more than 500 UK businesses questioned are worried their client data isn’t handled securely enough by their energy supplier.

The concern comes as energy companies are in the process of installing smart meters in both domestic and business properties.”


2)    A major hack hit hospital systems in the UK today, with the systems being held for ransom, and then began spreading to as many as 74 countries today.

Hospitals across the UK hit by ransomware cyber attack, systems knocked offline

Hospitals across England and Scotland are being forced to postpone appointments and divert patients elsewhere because systems have been taken offline by a ransomware attack in an event NHS England has declared as a ‘major incident’.

In a statement, NHS Digital, which runs IT systems for the health service, has confirmed that systems across the country have been brought down by a ransomware attack – specially by the Wanna Decryptor ransomware.”


The Ransomware Meltdown Experts Warned about is Here!!

A new strain of ransomware has spread quickly all over the world, causing crises in National Health Service hospitals and facilities around England, and gaining particular traction in Spain, where it has hobbled the large telecom company Telefonica, the natural gas company Gas Natural, and the electrical company Iberdrola. You know how people always talk about the Big One? As far as ransomware attacks go, this looks a whole lot like it.

The ransomware strain WannaCry (also known as WanaCrypt0r and WCry) that caused Friday’s barrage appears to be a new variant of a type that first appeared in late March. This new version has only gained steam since its initial barrage, with tens of thousands of infections in 74 countries so far today as of publication time. Its reach extends beyond the UK and Spain, into Russia, Taiwan, France, Japan, and dozens more countries


Appears the hacking tool was stolen from the US NSA, according to the New York Times.

“The attacks on Friday appeared to be the first time a cyberweapon developed by the N.S.A., funded by American taxpayers and stolen by an adversary had been unleashed by cybercriminals against patients, hospitals, businesses, governments and ordinary citizens.”

Hackers Hit Dozens of Countries Exploiting Stolen N.S.A. Tool”


3)    An update from the group in Port Angeles fighting the US Navy’s EMR wargames over the Olympic Peninsula (and, no doubt, southern BC including the islands.)


4)    In Seattle smeters are being planned, and resistance is growing. Opt out is allowed for $15 a month, after an initial fee. BC Hydro is still the most expensive.


5)    In Michigan resistance is growing to mandated smeters. We cannot stop our resistance just because we’ve been bullied, intimidated and harassed into having a smeter on our homes. They are still dangerous to our health, safety and security.  BC Hydro/FortisBC are hoping we will be compliant, complacent and just forget about this.

Pushback against smart meters continues to grow across the U.S.

Very little research has been done on the long-term health impacts of smart meter usage, and yet utilities and many legislators insist that the technology is installed for convenience and efficiency purposes. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared the type of wireless radiation emitted from smart meters a class 2B carcinogen, meaning it causes cancer.

Like in many other states, the Michigan Public Service Commission says that the scientific data is definitive: Smart meters are perfectly safe and people shouldn’t worry about using them or being near them. But this isn’t enough reassurance for the thousands of Michiganders, and the tens of thousands of Americans all across the country, who would prefer to stick to their old analog meters.” 



“You will observe with concern how long a useful truth may be known, and exist, before it is generally received and acted on.”   Ben Franklin


Update 2017-05-10 A major report re. health risks quotes BC Centre for Disease Control Posted May 12/17 

Written and shared by Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters, www.stopsmartmetersbc.com

1)   We all know that anything wireless is vulnerable to hacking, being far less secure than its wired version. Telus is installing micro/femto/small cells right outside our homes with the intention of providing cell phone service.  Here are articles that report that these mini cell transmitters can be hacked and both sides of conversations can be heard. This would be especially concerning given that children are using cell phones. This would be a great way for a pervert to insinuate himself into the child’s life. This is a good reason to refuse allowing these to put into our communities, in front of our homes.




2)    BC Hydro is being sued for wrongful dismissal of an employee for reporting violations.  Insiders have told me that Hydro is very aggressive toward its employees. Warnings were given, even before the smeters were being installed, that no one could say anything negative about this program or device, even among themselves. Violation of this order would result in termination. Several ees were fired when they refused to allow smeters on their homes because they knew they were dangerous.

“Lawsuit of the week: Former BC Hydro safety employee claims he was fired for reporting violations to WorkSafeBC”


3)    A report on recent evidence concludes that there is no safe level of exposure, with harmful effects being shown at extremely low levels of exposure to microwave radiation from wireless devices like smeters, cell phones and wifi.  Please read to the end. The conclusion summarizes our dilemma – profit has put science on the edge of the cliff, with no proof of safety being required before new devices/products are sold. 

Wireless communication technologies:
New study findings confirm risks of nonionizing radiation


“Even after the introduction of wireless communication tech-nologies, nonthermal effects have been researched extensive-ly in connection with cell membranes. In their review papers “Effects of Electromagnetic Fields on Cells” and “Electromag-netic Effects – From Cell Biology to Medicine,” FUNK et al. provide an overview of the state of research until 2006. They show, among other things, that electric fields with an electric field strength of 1 millivolt per meter (mV/m) — which corre-sponds to a power density level of ca. 0.0027 μW/m2 — can cause biologically relevant changes in the charge density at the cell membrane and thus may interfere with reactions in-side the cell.” Pg/ 5

Safety Code 6 allows exposure up to 2,740,000 uW/m2 for frequencies of 900MHz, which is the frequency used by the smeter transmitter.

These mechanisms of damage show clearly why no adverse effect threshold levels can be defined and currently valid thermal effects-based exposure levels do not provide any protection.”pg/ 5 

Ironically there is a quote from the BC Centre for Disease Control’s report (done because many of us stood outside Kendall’s office and handed studies to the receptionist, and hounded Kendall for months to read them), about the damage RF does to sperm. This is the very report to which Kendall referred in a letter to a member saying that this report showed there was no evidence of harm….  Below in Letters is Kendall’s letter for those who might want to “remind” Kendall of this finding.

“In March 2013, the British Columbia Centre for Disease Con-trol (BCCDC) in Canada published a 376-page research over-view “Radiofrequency Toolkit for Environmental Health Prac-titioners” in which oxidative stress is named as the main cause for risks regarding sperm: “Overall, oxidative stress seems one of the more plausible mechanisms of RF-induced sperm damage. It has been found fairly consistently in human and animal studies on sperm specifically and on other cells in

general” (BCCDC 2013, p. 272).” Pg. 6  http://www.bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Guidelines%20and%20Forms/Guidelines%20and%20Manuals/EH/EH/RadiofrequencyToolkit_v5_26032014.pdf  Section 10.   

Dr. Kendall said that if the BCCDC found any evidence of harm he would take precautionary measures. But when this report came out, I asked Kendall what measures he would take now that even the BCCDC acknowledged evidence of harm and he told me that he “didn’t agree with my interpretation”.      You see Dr. Kendall’s email address below. He is responsible for allowing smeters to be put on our homes and wifi in our schools. If he implemented the precautionary principle, as any good public health doctor must do when presented with evidence of harm, these would be removed!


From: “Kendall, Perry HLTH:EX” <Perry.Kendall@gov.bc.ca>
To: X
Cc: “Kendall, Perry HLTH:EX” <Perry.Kendall@gov.bc.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, 2 May, 2017 13:19:01
Subject: RE: wifi experiment & request

Dear X

There is a wealth of studies examining the effect of emf on living organisms and their constituent parts.

Health Canada has reviewed them, as have a number of international scientifically expert bodies. I have read many of these synthesis reports myself, and indeed commissioned one to be done by the BC Centre for Disease Control and epidemiology. Their results are up on the BCCDC website.

The conclusions of them all are that at present levels of exposure, there is no evidence of harm to the populations exposed.

Best wishes

Perry Kendall


“The entire earth turns more and more into a huge laboratory in which we, depending on our attitude and profession, ob-serve with eagerness or horror which global impact the mass use of chemicals, electromagnetic fields, genetically manipu-lated organisms will have – only we cannot clean up this la-boratory quite as easily when we realize the experiment went wrong” (NEITZKE et al. 1994, p. 319).

Update 2017-05-09 May 12 free online seminar re. EHS/MCS Environmental Sensitivities seminar below! posted May 11/17

1)    Several studies that support the association between cell phones and brain cancer have been published recently. It’s time for us to push our provincial and federal government to not only improve the information on the various health websites (Perry Kendall, Cancer Society, BC Centre for Disease Control, Health Canada) so that what is provided is accurate with appropriate warnings. It’s also time for labels to be put on phones with the warnings instead of being hidden deep within manuals.

Long-term cell phone use increases brain tumor risk

“In the U.S. the lifetime risk of developing glioma, the most common brain cancer, is between 1 in 200 and 1 in 250. If glioma risk doubled after 20 years of cell phone use (as the research cited below suggests), the lifetime risk would be between 1 in 100 and 1 in 125.”


2)    On Friday May 12 there will be a free online seminar about environmental sensitivities including EHS. Info about how register is below in Letters.  This seminar is available for free for 1 day only.

3)    Many people across North America are discussing lawsuits against utility companies that are forcing people to have smeters on their homes – exposing them and their families to a 2b carcinogen against their choice, as endangering their safety and security.  Hydro and Fortis cannot say they didn’t know. They only can say that they didn’t care. 

Are Microwave Industries and Utilities Operating the Way Talcum Power makers Obfuscated??

“Personally, if I were a utility company forcing microwave-operated AMI Smart Meters on to customers, I’d be very worried about all the future lawsuits coming the company’s way.

Furthermore, states public utility commissions ought to be recapitulating and correcting mandatory smart meter laws.  Why?  For not protecting the public’s health and wellbeing, plus the harassment utilities and PUCs impose upon consumers.”



From: “Karen Forbes” <crystal_health2010@yahoo.ca>
To: “Karen Forbes” <crystal_health2010@yahoo.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 3:38:43 PM
Subject: Free MCS/EHS online seminar May 12/2017


Environmental Sensitivities Awareness Day  [http://www.aseq-ehaq.ca/event/environmental-sensitivities-day/?lang=en]

What you can do!

This event will be available in French and in English. The presentations are pre-recorded and will be available on our website as of midnight  May 12 onwards. You can choose the language of your choice, i.e., French or English to view the entire seminar. You can watch the seminar at your convenience.

Registration is required.

TO REGISTER CLICK HERE  (http://www.aseq-ehaq.ca/registration-for-the-may-12-2017-online-conference/?lang=en)

What you need to know

For over 30 years patients have been seeking help from primary care physicians for new and emerging medical conditions. In the early years, skeptics challenged the physiological validity of the symptoms but over time, a large body of scientific evidence has grown that supports that these conditions are biological. Education and awareness of the research has not been sufficiently disseminated to medical professionals and politicians. For Environmental Sensitivities Awareness day, we have gathered a group of experts to help make us more aware of the medical, social and legal issues of Environmental Sensitivities.

Who needs to know

It is for patients and their family and friends, people in their support system, lawyers, healthcare providers, politicians and employees of social agencies.


John Molot (MD)  [http://www.aseq-ehaq.ca/john-molot/?lang=en]

The Canaries Are Real; Understanding Multiple Chemical Sensitivity

Paul Héroux (Ph.D)  [http://www.aseq-ehaq.ca/paul-heroux/?lang=en]

Are Electromagnetically and Chemically-Hypersensitive people Metabolically different from Everyone Else?

Stéphane Bélainsky  [http://www.aseq-ehaq.ca/4828/?lang=en]

Electromagnetic fields in our homes: mitigating our environment

Michel Gaudet  [http://www.aseq-ehaq.ca/michel-gaudet/?lang=en]

Environmental Sensitivities – Legal aspects

TO REGISTER CLICK HERE  (http://www.aseq-ehaq.ca/registration-for-the-may-12-2017-online-conference/?lang=en)

Spread the news

Please share this information via social media and email with your family, friends and your contacts. Especially with your entourage and the professionals who help you (such as your doctor, lawyer, nurse, etc.)

Please help share this event by:

1.            Clicking the “share” button and help spread the news on your personal Facebook walls and by sharing in related Facebook groups you are members of. 

2.            Tagging Facebook friends who may be interested in joining this online event.


There is no charge for registration to view the seminar on May 12, 2017. The seminar will be available to view after May 12, but will require a donation of your choice in order to access the presentation. Please note, tax receipts will be available for donations of $20 or over.

Thank you for your support!  [http://www.aseq-ehaq.ca/dons/]


Tel: 514 332 4320

Email: office@aseq-ehaq.ca 




“Our prime purpose in this life is to help others. And if you can’t help them, at least don’t hurt them.”

– Dalai Lama


Monsanto Is Scrambling To Bury This Breaking Story – Don’t Let This Go Unshared! posted May 8/17

I’m truly taken aback by this information being censored from the public and not on the news. 

Update 2017-05-06 Warning re ITRON smeters from ITRON Smart meters! Posted May 8/17

1)    An electrical engineer in the US with whom I’ve been communicating has taken the ITRON smeter apart and found it lacking in significant regards re. safety. One major one is that it is improperly fused. He provided this information which is of great significance in confirming that these indeed are fire hazards. ITRON advises not to install the meter where it could start a fire if it fails!!! This means it should not be on our homes. The electrical engineer charges that any utility that uses the ITRON meter ‘as is’, without proper fusing, is guilty of harmful negligence.

“The problem is meters and sockets are NOT known to be properly protected with the correct fuse. 

The three safety instructions below were copied from page 9 of the  ITRON manual and indirectly point out the problem.  All electrical equipment is expected to fail eventually.   The question is not “ does it create a hazard If it fails”; the question is “does it create a hazard when it fails”.  The answer depends on the rating of the fuse protecting the meter and socket.  

The third instruction is most fundamental.  ITRON acknowledges that meters may fail in a manner that could cause death, injury, or fire. Two ways to accomplish this are to restrict access to the meter  or to instantaneously remove power when the meter fails.  The first instruction is to use fuses.    The second instruction is to not use the meter a protective device – don’t rely on the remote switch as a safety feature.

·        All voltage paths (measurement and auxiliary) must be fused.

·        Do not use any meter functions or features for primary protection purposes.

·        Do not install the meter where failure of the device could cause death, injury or release sufficient energy to start a fire.”

2)    Minnesota group of cities is working to protect municipal rights re. micro/small cells, maintaining the right to be involved in siting and the public right of ways. Groups need to organize in BC because Telus is installing these things NOW.


Here is a fact sheet which anyone fighting having these microcells put up in front of homes with no public notification or approval should read and share with the local municipal council.


Talking points


3)    On April 27 a resolution passed at the Association of Kootenay and Boundary Local Governments (AKBLG) Conference which will be presented to the Union of BC Municipalities Annual Meeting in September regarding micro/small cells, asking for local governments to be consulted on the siting of these transmitter in their cities on the public property. I would ask that councils across the province be presented with this or a similar resolution, or at least asking for the council to support this resolution when it is presented at the UBCM.  If people want to join together to figure out how best to do this, to work together on strategy, let me know and I will help get people in touch. Send email to dsnoble@shaw.ca with “UBCM resolution” on the subject line.

The Resolution:  

Whereas public consultation on the placement of cell towers is mandated; and 

Whereas new technology is moving away from these large towers to microcell transmitters which do not require local government or public consultation; 

Therefore be it resolved that the AKBLG request the UBCM petition relevant provincial and federal governments to mandate consultation with the land use authorities and the public regarding microcell transmitter siting within 100 meters of residences, schools and hospitals.”  

Breakdown of the Resolution: 

1. A federal regulatory loophole permits cellular antennas to be placed on existing structures like utility poles in Canada without public consultation or consent.  

2. There is a coordinated move by the telecommunications industry and the federal government to saturate our neighbourhoods with small cell, or microcell, transmitters.  

3.  Local governments must lobby to regain the right to be consulted on the placement of small cells on their streets.

4)    In the UK people have a choice of supplies of electricity, and aren’t limited to a monopoly as we are. Perhaps millions of smeters in the UK will need to be replaced due to design flaws that cause problems when switching providers.  It seems many utilities and meter manufacturers were in too big a rush to get these things in and didn’t ensure they were safe and did what they were supposed to do.

Millions of smart meters may need replacing due to IT blunder

 Written and shared by Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters, www.stopsmartmetersbc.com

For the first time major energy suppliers have admitted that some of the 8 million “first generation” smart meters fitted in households are incompatible with a new nation al communications network, which links their systems to the devices. 



From: X
Sent: May 5, 2017 6:16 PM
To: Complaints BCUC:EX <Complaints@bcuc.com>
Subject: BC Hydro Extortion and discrimination

Dear BCUC Complaints Department,

I am a BC Hydro customer living in the Bella Coola Valley.  I never Opted-In to the “Smart Meter” program because of health and safety concerns, and still retain the safe and reliable long life CSA approved and fire resistant surge protected Analog (so called Legacy) meter.  The local electricity grid is powered by the local Clayton Falls facility and is not connected to the main provincial grid.  Why the BCUC was prevented by BC Government order from reviewing the Smart Meter Program (other than Tariff rate setting) becomes obvious seeing the profits made, and continuing to be made, by those promoting the AMI scenario.

As if this billion dollar ripoff of taxpayer funds was not enough, for a number of years I have been forced to pay the “extortion fee” of over $388/year to retain my analog meter and electricity supply, supposedly because there is an extra cost now required by BC Hydro to read my meter, whereas previous to the “smart meter” program this meter reading cost was included as part of the normal service and did not require a special extra fee. What really upsets me is that all the “smart” meters in this valley also require manual meter reading, yet only those still with analog meters get charged for the reading service.  This is both discriminatory and extortionate no matter how BC Hydro tries to skirt the issue.

It is my understanding that the BCUC still retains the power to set and adjust the “Legacy Meter” fee.  If this fee is really not a penalty in disguise but just a meter reading fee, why is the same fee not applied to every customer meter requiring a manual read (e.g. every meter in this valley)?  I would suggest that the “Legacy Meter” fee be reviewed again by the BCUC and entirely eliminated as has been done by jurisdictions elsewhere.  I do not think it fair or reasonable that those of us who still have the non-radiating long lasting and safe Analog meters should be discriminated against and charged an extra reading fee when so many “Smart??” meters also require manual reading.

Other concerns regarding the “smart” meter program include the fact the meters require never ending firmware updates, are a fire and health risk, have no surge protection, have short service life, require expensive IT support, expose the grid to hackers, charge customers for the extra power used by their transmitters, and are nothing but an overpriced surveillance device. Unfortunately, the BCUC emasculation by those in power prevented proper cost/benefit analysis and review prior to program approval.  Let us hope that a newly elected government will return the BCUC to it’s original mandate rather than exclusion from large and expensive projects such as “smart” meters and Site C.

Your reply will be appreciated.




“Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.” Aldous Huxley

An activist in the US responded to the article about the street artists drawing murals about the plight of the bees with this email about his personal experience: Posted May 4/17

Around 2010 my Mom became sick and my wife and I dropped things to take care of her and my 22 beehives (at different locations) were one of the things we dropped. I live on 2 1/2 acres and I still tried to keep three beehives. The Smart Meters came about 5 years
ago. I have a cell tower .6 miles South and a hospital 900 ft. South with a communication antenna on top with Smart Meters and apartments all (12 meter per apt) new to the South. I have lived here 24 years beekeeping was good – lots of raw honey. The last 5 years people started talking about their fruit trees would not bear fruit any longer (no bees). The RF on my property is pushing 2,000 uW/m2. I do have a hive 15 miles east on a friend’s 40 ac and it is fine. His property has butterflies, lots on insects, and lots of flowering plants. It is like day & night to see no life around me and almost like a paradise on the 40 ac. His RF reading by the bees is .8 u W/m2.

I am sending a youtube of the hospital. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2TIoAMH3c8

St. John Owasso Hospital — Radiating Their Neighbors!


Fwd: Bill C-291 – @parl.gc.ca check the list send a note Demanding GMO labeling in Canada! posted May 3/17

from: Charles

Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 9:12 AM
To:Lovey C
Cc:Ziad.Aboultaif@parl.gc.ca ; Dan Albas ; harold.albrecht@parl.gc.ca ; John.Aldag@parl.gc.ca ; Omar.Alghabra@parl.gc.ca ; Leona.Alleslev@parl.gc.ca ; dean.allison@parl.gc.ca ; Rona Ambrose ; William.Amos@parl.gc.ca ; Gary.Anand@parl.gc.ca ; David Anderson, MP ; charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca ; Mel.Arnold@parl.gc.ca ; Rene.Arseneault@parl.gc.ca ; Chandra.Arya@parl.gc.ca ; niki.ashton@parl.gc.ca ; Robert.Aubin@parl.gc.ca ; Ramez.Ayoub@parl.gc.ca ; Vance.Badawey@parl.gc.ca ; Larry.Bagnell@parl.gc.ca ; Navdeep.Bains@parl.gc.ca ; John.Barlow@parl.gc.ca ; Xavier.Barsalou-Duval@parl.gc.ca ; Frank.Baylis@parl.gc.ca ; Mario.Beaulieu@parl.gc.ca ; Mauril Bélanger ; carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca ; Sheri.Benson@parl.gc.ca ; candice.bergen@parl.gc.ca ; maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca ; Luc.Berthold@parl.gc.ca ; james.bezan@parl.gc.ca ; Marie-Claude.Bibeau@parl.gc.ca ; Chris.Bittle@parl.gc.ca ; Daniel.Blaikie@parl.gc.ca ; Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca ; Rachel.Blaney@parl.gc.ca ; kelly.block@parl.gc.ca ; Randy.Boissonnault@parl.gc.ca ; Mike.Bossio@parl.gc.ca ; Sylvie.Boucher@parl.gc.ca ; Michel.Boudrias@parl.gc.ca ; Alexandre.Boulerice@parl.gc.ca ; Marjolaine.Boutin-Sweet@parl.gc.ca ; John.Brassard@parl.gc.ca ; Bob.Bratina@parl.gc.ca ; Pierre.Breton@parl.gc.ca ; Adele Desjardins ; Ruth Ellen Brosseau ; gord.brown@parl.gc.ca ; Celina.Caesar-Chavannes@parl.gc.ca ; blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca ; Richard.Cannings@parl.gc.ca ; NPDGuyCaron ; Jim.Carr@parl.gc.ca ; colin.carrie@parl.gc.ca ; Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca ; Sean.Casey@parl.gc.ca ; Bardish.Chagger@parl.gc.ca ; Francois-Philippe.Champagne@parl.gc.ca ; Arnold.Chan@parl.gc.ca ; Shaun.Chen@parl.gc.ca ; michael.chong@parl.gc.ca ; Francois.Choquette@parl.gc.ca ; David Christopherson, MP ; Alupa.Clarke@parl.gc.ca ; tony.clement@parl.gc.ca ; Michael.Cooper@parl.gc.ca ; Serge.Cormier@parl.gc.ca ; nathan.cullen@parl.gc.ca ; rodger.cuzner@parl.gc.ca ; Julie Dabrusin ; Pam.Damoff@parl.gc.ca ; don.davies@parl.gc.ca ; Matt.DeCourcey@parl.gc.ca ; Gerard.Deltell@parl.gc.ca ; Sukh.Dhaliwal@parl.gc.ca ; Anju.Dhillon@parl.gc.ca ; Nicola.DiIorio@parl.gc.ca ; stephane.dion@parl.gc.ca ; Kerry.Diotte@parl.gc.ca ; Todd.Doherty@parl.gc.ca ; fin.donnelly@parl.gc.ca ; earl.dreeshen@parl.gc.ca ; Francis.Drouin@parl.gc.ca ; Matthew.Dube@parl.gc.ca ; Emmanuel.Dubourg@parl.gc.ca ; Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca ; Terry.Duguid@parl.gc.ca ; Kirsty Duncan ; linda.duncan@parl.gc.ca ; PLDusseault ; Scott.Duvall@parl.gc.ca ; Julie.Dzerowicz@parl.gc.ca ; wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca ; Jim.Eglinski@parl.gc.ca ; Ali.Ehsassi@parl.gc.ca ; Faycal.El-Khoury@parl.gc.ca ; Neil.Ellis@parl.gc.ca ; mark.eyking@parl.gc.ca ; Doug.Eyolfson@parl.gc.ca ; Ted Falk ; Ed Fast ; Greg.Fergus@parl.gc.ca ; Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca ; Diane Finley ; Pat.Finnigan@parl.gc.ca ; Patrick Casey ; Peter.Fonseca@parl.gc.ca ; judy.foote@parl.gc.ca ; Rheal.Fortin@parl.gc.ca ; Peter.Fragiskatos@parl.gc.ca ; Colin.Fraser@parl.gc.ca ; Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca ; Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca ; hedy.fry@parl.gc.ca ; Stephen.Fuhr@parl.gc.ca ; cheryl.gallant@parl.gc.ca ; marc.garneau@parl.gc.ca ; Randall.Garrison@parl.gc.ca ; Bernard.Genereux@parl.gc.ca ; Garnett.Genuis@parl.gc.ca ; Mark.Gerretsen@parl.gc.ca ; Marilene.Gill@parl.gc.ca ; Marilyn.Gladu@parl.gc.ca ; Joel.Godin@parl.gc.ca ; Pam.Goldsmith-Jones@parl.gc.ca ; ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca ; Karina.Gould@parl.gc.ca ; jacques.gourde@parl.gc.ca ; David.Graham@parl.gc.ca ; Raj.Grewal@parl.gc.ca ; Patty.Hajdu@parl.gc.ca ; Cheryl.Hardcastle@parl.gc.ca ; Rachael.Harder@parl.gc.ca ; Ken.Hardie@parl.gc.ca ; stephen.harper@parl.gc.ca ; TJ.Harvey@parl.gc.ca ; Kent.Hehr@parl.gc.ca ; Jim.Hillyer@parl.gc.ca ; randy.hoback@parl.gc.ca ; Mark.Holland@parl.gc.ca ; Anthony.Housefather@parl.gc.ca ; carol.hughes@parl.gc.ca ; Ahmed.Hussen@parl.gc.ca ; Gudie.Hutchings@parl.gc.ca ; Angelo.Iacono@parl.gc.ca ; Matt.Jeneroux@parl.gc.ca ; Gord.Johns@parl.gc.ca ; Georgina.Jolibois@parl.gc.ca ; Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca ; Yvonne.Jones@parl.gc.ca ; Bernadette.Jordan@parl.gc.ca ; Majid.Jowhari@parl.gc.ca ; peter.julian@parl.gc.ca ; Darshan.Kang@parl.gc.ca ; Pat.Kelly@parl.gc.ca ; jason.kenney@parl.gc.ca ; peter.kent@parl.gc.ca ; Iqra.Khalid@parl.gc.ca ; Kamal.Khera@parl.gc.ca ; Robert.Kitchen@parl.gc.ca ; Tom.Kmiec@parl.gc.ca ; Jenny.Kwan@parl.gc.ca ; mike.lake@parl.gc.ca ; David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca ; kevin.lamoureux@parl.gc.ca ; Linda.Lapointe@parl.gc.ca ; guy.lauzon@parl.gc.ca ; Stephane.Lauzon@parl.gc.ca ; Helene.Laverdiere@parl.gc.ca ; denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca ; dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca ; Diane.Lebouthillier@parl.gc.ca ; Paul.Lefebvre@parl.gc.ca ; Kellie.Leitch@parl.gc.ca ; pierre.lemieux@parl.gc.ca ; Denis.Lemieux@parl.gc.ca ; Andrew.Leslie@parl.gc.ca ; Michael.Levitt@parl.gc.ca ; Ron.Liepert@parl.gc.ca ; ben.lobb@parl.gc.ca ; Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca ; Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca ; Lloyd.Longfield@parl.gc.ca ; Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca ; tom.lukiwski@parl.gc.ca ; lawrence.macaulay@parl.gc.ca ; Alistair.MacGregor@parl.gc.ca ; dave.mackenzie@parl.gc.ca ; Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca ; Larry.Maguire@parl.gc.ca ; Sheila.Malcolmson@parl.gc.ca ; James.Maloney@parl.gc.ca ; Simon.Marcil@parl.gc.ca ; brian.masse@parl.gc.ca ; Remi.Masse@parl.gc.ca ; irene.mathyssen@parl.gc.ca ; Bryan.May@parl.gc.ca ; Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca ; john.mccallum@parl.gc.ca ; Kelly.McCauley@parl.gc.ca ; phil.mccoleman@parl.gc.ca ; Karen.McCrimmon@parl.gc.ca ; Ken.McDonald@parl.gc.ca ; david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca ; john.mckay@parl.gc.ca ; Catherine.McKenna@parl.gc.ca ; Ron.McKinnon@parl.gc.ca ; cathy.mcleod@parl.gc.ca ; Michael.McLeod@parl.gc.ca ; Alexandra.Mendes@parl.gc.ca ; Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca ; MaryAnn.Mihychuk@parl.gc.ca ; larry.miller@parl.gc.ca ; Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca ; Maryam.Monsef@parl.gc.ca ; Christine.Moore@parl.gc.ca ; Bill.Morneau@parl.gc.ca ; Robert.Morrissey@parl.gc.ca ; Tom Mulcair ; Joyce Murray ; Pierre.Nantel@parl.gc.ca ; Eva.Nassif@parl.gc.ca ; John.Nater@parl.gc.ca ; Bob.Nault@parl.gc.ca ; rob.nicholson@parl.gc.ca ; Alex.Nuttall@parl.gc.ca ; deepak.obhrai@parl.gc.ca ; Jennifer.OConnell@parl.gc.ca ; Rob.Oliphant@parl.gc.ca ; Joe.Oliver@parl.gc.ca ; Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca ; Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca ; robert.falcon@parl.gc.ca ; Denis.Paradis@parl.gc.ca ; Pierre.Paul-Hus@parl.gc.ca ; Monique.Pauze@parl.gc.ca ; Joe.Peschisolido@parl.gc.ca ; Kyle.Peterson@parl.gc.ca ; Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca ; Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca ; Michel.Picard@parl.gc.ca ; louis.plamondon@parl.gc.ca ; pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca ; Jean-Claude.Poissant@parl.gc.ca ; Anne Minh-Thu Quach ; Carla.Qualtrough@parl.gc.ca ; lisa.raitt@parl.gc.ca ; Tracey.Ramsey@parl.gc.ca ; Murray.Rankin@parl.gc.ca ; Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca ; Alain.Rayes@parl.gc.ca ; Kim Seguin ; scott.reid@parl.gc.ca
Subject: Re: FW: Bill C-291
thank you Lovey,

Dear MP’s of CANADA,

I have taken the liberty to attach some information that may help you to understand the significant harm GMO “franken foods” can do to us.

Please vote with an educated mind and an open heart in good conscience and faith that you are serving the men and women of the Dominion of Canada.



PS. some very informative links below. Especially the CAFR accounts that need to be fully disclosed.
Subject: Bill C-291

> Soon, in early May Bill C-291 will be voted on.  PLEASE SEND TO YOUR
> MP asking for support.
> Bill C-291  requires mandatory GMO labeling.

Charles Norman, Holmes, Grantee, agent without recourse for:
In Exclusive Equity I trust.
“You have to understand that most people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.”
~ Morpheus, ‘The Matrix’
Must Watch Video on how Banking truly works
Dean helping Tony get Restoration of his property from RCMP
The Truth about Who is Obligated to pay Income Tax in CANADA
How They Enslave Us
Why we never get ahead –  Intro to CAFR accounts
TAKE BACK THIS LAND – song by Bill Henderson of Chilliwack… says it all. – video

Update 2017-05-01 The truth about 5G and why Telus is putting fiber optic cable everywhere. posted May 3/17

Written and shared by Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters, www.stopsmartmetersbc.com

1)    BC Hydro continues to have smeters with operating transmitters that should have been turned off. A member shared this letter from Hydro to BCUC with details of just a few more, but how many others are out there and no one knows? If you wonder and don’t have an RF meter, you can use an AM radio to get some idea.  http://www.electricsense.com/2901/how-to-detect-rf-radiation-using-your-am-radio/   Test over a long period of time and at different times of the day.


2)    An article by Dariusz Leszczynski about how money and industry corrupt science, much as was the heart of Louis Slesin’s tribute to Dr. Singh.

Where science and big money collide…


3)    In several US states, Duke Energy has installed ITRON smeters and people are getting major increases in bills. Outrage is building. There is an effort building to connect people who have problems with ITRON in these areas. I asked if they wanted info from BC ITRON customers but at this point they are busy building their efforts in Duke’s area.

5+ years of shenanigans with Duke Energy and their AMI “smart meters”


4)    The truth and hype about 5G. From this article, it seems certain that Telus’s “offer” to bring fiber optic cable right to homes is the necessary first step in achieving a “5G world”.

The Next Generation of Wireless — “5G” — Is All Hype.

In order to work, 99% of any “5G” wireless deployment will have to be fiber running very close to every home and business. The high-frequency spectrum the carriers are planning to use wobbles billions of times a second but travels incredibly short distances and gets interfered with easily…

We’re going to have to have fiber interconnection points right next to houses and office buildings, and in many places fiber running inside those buildings. And to reach indoor areas with reliable high capacity, you’ll need multiple antennas inside rooms that can beam signals towards you from multiple angles (to avoid the “people as bags of water” problem).”


5)    Site C petition delivers 120K signatures asking feds to halt dam construction



From: Jerry Flynn
Sent: April 30, 2017 8:36 PM
To: emcintosh@thestar.ca
Subject: FW: Minister of National Defense: Harjit Singh Sajjan – Canada’s National Security is in Peril!

Please advise Bruce this is an exclusive to the ‘Star’ – for 72 hours!

Jerry Flynn

—–Original Message—–

From: Jerry Flynn
Sent: April-30-17 4:22 PM
To: ‘bcsmith@thestar.ca’ <bcsmith@thestar.ca>; ‘James.Bezan@parl.gc.ca’ <James.Bezan@parl.gc.ca>; ‘Randall.Garrison@parl.gc.ca’ <Randall.Garrison@parl.gc.ca>; ‘mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca’ <mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca>; ‘Tony.Clement@parl.gc.ca’ <Tony.Clement@parl.gc.ca>; ‘Kirsty.Duncan@parl.gc.ca’ <Kirsty.Duncan@parl.gc.ca>; ‘Matthew.Dube@parl.gc.ca’ <Matthew.Dube@parl.gc.ca>; ‘Michel.Boudrias@parl.gc.ca’ <Michel.Boudrias@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: ‘Harjit.Sajjan@parl.gc.ca’ <Harjit.Sajjan@parl.gc.ca>; ‘Justin.Trudeau@parl.gc.ca’ <Justin.Trudeau@parl.gc.ca>; ‘Ralph.Goodale@parl.gc.ca’ <Ralph.Goodale@parl.gc.ca>; ‘Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca’ <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>
Subject: Minister of National Defense: Harjit Singh Sajjan – Canada’s National Security is in Peril!

April 30, 2017

Dear Mr. Campion-Smith,
Ottawa Bureau Chief, Toronto Star:

Concerning Harjit Singh Sajjan, this too should concern ALL Canadians, indeed all North Americans!

Canada’s National Security and Public Safety are in Peril!

On December 15, 2015, I emailed the attached letter [http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Letter-to-Minister-of-National-Defence-Hon.-Harjit-S.-Sajjan-Threat-to-Canadas-National-Security-by-Jerry-Flynn-Dec.-15-2015.pdf], entitled: “Threat to Canada’s National Security” to Defense Minister Sajjan, with a copy to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Although Minister Sajjan did reply to me, he did so in a polite but obviously dismissive way, making it frighteningly clear that he felt my concerns were unfounded. I replied, equally politely, that he was being poorly advised.

I am a retired Canadian Armed Forces captain who spent 22 of my 26+ years in Canada’s military in the arcane fields of Electronic Warfare (EW) and Signals Intelligence (SIGINT). My security clearance was “Top-Secret (code word).” My most relevant appointments included: two years in National Defence Headquarters in the Directorate of Electronic Warfare (DEW), where I was the sole EW officer charged with supporting Canada’s only army EW Company. For two years I worked closely with U.S. and NATO army EW units and completed, at my own initiative, a lengthy NATO army EW officers’ course in Anzio, Italy. Later, I participated in a major NATO army EW officers’ field exercise in Germany (again, at my own initiative). While in DEW I accepted invitations to visit the U.S. Pentagon and, separately, Fort Bragg, N.C., the U.S. Army’s major EW base. My previous two-year posting was in the SIGINT world, for which I was personally sought out and asked if I would assume the duties of both Executive Officer and Operations Officer at one of Canada’s largest and most sensitive SIGINT radio stations. Here approximately 200 specially-trained radio intercept operators conducted either COMINT or ELINT under my direction. Throughout this period I worked closely with the USA’s NSA and, to a lesser degree, with Britain’s GCHQ. Earlier in my career I conducted Radio Warfare (today’s EW) at sea aboard two Canadian warships.

No scientist trained in EMF (electro-magnetic field) radiation and no military EW expert would be so stupid as to utilize wireless ‘smart’ meters as the underpinnings of a country’s national electric power grid, from a national security perspective. Nor would they even mention ‘wireless anything’ being an option for such a critical part of a country’s infrastructure! As a former EW and SIGINT expert (and one-time operator of Canada’s most northerly HAM radio station – VE8TU), I can say without fear of contradiction that there is absolutely no communication system on earth more defenseless, more vulnerable or more unreliable than a wireless radio system! Surely, World War II taught us that? Today’s micro technology, though infinitely more sophisticated, versatile and capable is even more susceptible to attacks from not just hostile nations, but from organized terrorists and others wishing to do harm to Canada.

The USA’s eminent Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, Executive Director of the *EMP Task Force on National and Homeland Security, deserves credit for much of the following information. [1] [2] [3] An EMP or *electromagnetic pulse* is like a super-energetic radio wave from natural or manmade causes that can damage and destroy electronic systems across vast regions, potentially across the entire continental United States, across Europe, or any other country that has not hardened its electric power grid. Authorities say that Russia and China have substantially hardened their electric grids. Other nations are also beginning to do so, but not Canada or the U.S., even though the U.S. government has received 11 studies conducted prior to 2008 by senior U.S. military and intelligence authorities, all of which concluded that the USA could be facing an electric Armageddon!) [4] NASA scientists also continue to warn that a huge solar EMP is long-overdue! [5]

The Achilles Heel of every modern nation is its electric power grid, on which all other infrastructures depend, e.g., telecommunications, fuel, transportation, food and water supply, healthcare, waste and disposal, commerce and finance, etc. From a national security perspective, the governments of Canada and the U.S. are guilty of making the same four unbelievably stupid mistakes:

1) Allowing electric power utilities to regulate themselves, knowing full well that they are profit-driven;

2) Permitting their previously separate national electric power grids to be interconnected – the consequence of which is that both countries now share the same frighteningly unprotected and vulnerable North American electric power grid!

3) Permitting their electric utilities to utilize wireless radio ‘Smart’ meters to control and manage their operations nationwide; and

4) Failing to create an effective independent oversight authority within government to ensure that electric power utilities did nothing that could possibly jeopardize national security or harm its people!

Being profit-driven, electric power utilities in both countries understandably make maximum use of state-of-the-art technology (i.e. in industrial control and communication systems, etc.) to manage and control their far-flung power generation, transmission and distribution operations. However, modern technologies all contain delicate, heat-sensitive microelectronics which are known to be some 10-million times more vulnerable than were vacuum tubes!  While use of state-of-the-art technology can greatly improve the efficiency of any industry, military and intelligence authorities know that microelectronics and wireless communications are also the Achilles Heel of any electric power utility!

Because Canada and the U.S. share a common electric power grid, both countries now face the same frightening existential threats:

1) Electromagnetic pulse or “EMP” – which can be natural (solar flares) or man-made – either nuclear or non-nuclear!

2) Cyber-attack – viruses and/or hacking, which can take down significant portions of a national grid or the entire grid!  

3) Radio Frequency (RF) weapons, a single one of which can cause significant local or regional damage to any electric power grid. [6]

It is public knowledge today that North Korea is determined to become a nuclear power with the capability to launch nuclear missiles that can reach North America. [7] Intelligence agencies have long-known that North Korea already has both mid-range and long range ICBMs capable of delivering a nuclear EMP over the USA! Russia and China are also known to possess EMP weapons, and Iran is thought to be pursuing them as well. [8] [9] Al-Qaeda is also known to possess at least RF weapons!

On April 7, 2015, NORAD Commander, Admiral William Gortney, said NORAD is moving back into the underground bunker inside Cheyenne Mountain, spending $700 million to further harden the bunker against nuclear electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack from North Korea and others. [10]

It is estimated that, if a nation is without electric power for one-year, 90% of its people will die! And the U.S. intelligence community knows that, of the 2,000 or so EHV (extremely high voltage) power transformers in the U.S., it would take the destruction of just nine ‘key’ EHV power transformers to plunge the entire nation – and because their grids are interconnected, probably Canada too – into darkness! Governments must wake up and realize that EHV power transformers, which are enormous in size and hugely expensive, are custom ordered and take about 18 months each to build! Only two countries in the world now manufacture EHV power transformers – neither of which is Canada or the U.S.! Despite this, electric power industry lobbyists in the U.S. continue to block – as they have for years – passage of legislation still in the U.S. Senate that would oblige electric utilities to harden critical elements of the U.S. national electric power grid!

In conclusion, given the mind-numbing reality of today’s existential threats (EMPs, cyber-attack, RF weapons, etc.), no country must ever again allow electric power utilities to regulate themselves! Instead, national governments must invoke their equivalent of a “National Emergency Act” and impose their national security needs on electric utilities across the country. In part, national governments must:

1) Immediately ensure that all critical elements of their present national electric grid are suitably hardened;

2) Urgently develop and implement a plan to quickly dismantle the current national electric grid in favour of more secure smaller, independent provincial, regional, municipal and even micro-grids;

3) Immediately replace all wireless ‘Smart’ meters with more robust and durable analogue meters;

4) Replace, where possible, all existing wireless technology with hardened, buried fiber optic and/or coaxial cable;

5) Establish an effective and technically-capable engineering oversight unit within the nation’s military electronic warfare (EW) headquarters. (This new EW unit’s primary mandate would be to oversee and regulate the generation, transmission and distribution of all electricity throughout the country).

6) Subordinate all provincial utility regulatory commissions to the military’s new EW unit established in 5) above.

In this day of highly sophisticated microelectronics and their glaring vulnerabilities, it is imperative that national governments ensure that today’s unimaginable spectre of an electric Armageddon can never happen again!  [11] [12] [13]

No modern country, and especially not Canada, should have a Minister of National Defense (nor a Minister of Public Safety) who does not personally understand and fully appreciate that a ‘next’ war will likely be an all-out cyber and/or EW war. Today the world is driven by electronics, which, because of man’s ignorance and greed, affects and threatens us all.

James G. (“Jerry”) Flynn, Captain (Retired)

[1] http://www.emptaskforcenhs.com/category/emp/
[2] http://www.emptaskforcenhs.com/emp/canadas-senate-committee-on-national-security-and-defence-forum/
[3] http://securethegrid.com/tag/peter-pry/
[4] http://www.emptaskforcenhs.com/uncategorized/letter-to-president-barack-obama/
[5] https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jul/28/uk-can-expect-just-12-hours-warning-damaging-solar-storm-space-weather
[6] http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/ray-gun-feared-as-americas-biggest-threat/
[7] http://www.emptaskforcenhs.com/emp/the-miniaturization-myth/#more-291
[8]  http://www.emptaskforcenhs.com/emp/the-miniaturization-myth/
[9] http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/north-korea-emp-attack-could-destroy-u-s-right-now/
[10] http://www.newsmax.com/PeterPry/north-korea-nuclear-launch/2016/04/01/id/721889/
[11] http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/maine-setting-standard-for-emp-defense/
[12] http://securethegrid.com/2015/04/14/frank-gaffney-on-judge-jeanine-pirro-u-s-power-grid-danger/

[13] http://www.globalresearch.ca/an-inexpensive-fix-to-prevent-armageddon/5377338

PS. On May 18, 2016, I sent a registered letter to Prime Minister Trudeau, the subject of which was: Canada’s National Security and the Health of its People are in Grave Danger! Again, I received no response! Earlier still, I had sent similar letters to then Prime Minister Harper and his Defense Minister, Peter McKay, neither of whom bothered to reply as well.


“Our Society is run by insane people for insane objectives. We are being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I m liable to be put away as insane for expressing that.

That’s what is insane about it…”

John Lennon

Dangers of “pulsed microwave technologies” posted May 2/17

CDSAPI’s Added Comments: Both the Provincial and the Federal governments are promoting, protecting and implementing “pulsed microwave technologies” that WE KNOW are so biologically disruptive that they are now PRIMARY CAUSATIVE FACTORS in the exponentially escalating health deterioration and degeneration in the human and animal populations.

The pulsed-microwave technology at the center of modern communication systems – to which everyone is now being exposed, some more than others – is affecting brain/neurological function with very devastating consequences.

Why is the Liberal’s mandatory Smart-meter, the wireless in classrooms, and the proposed ‘G5 microwave-emmitting units on every lamppostagenda not a major ELECTION ISSUE?

Or is the health and functionality of the population sacrificable for Techno Convenience, Expediency, and Profit.

It is important that the PRIORITIES remain THE PRIORITIES.
Biological Survival has to be the FIRST PRIORITY.
Without it, everything else is redundant.

Please read a letter from Jerry Flynn relaying info from Barrie Trower, formerly of Britain’s MI5.

Both Jerry Flynn and Barrie Trower spent several decades of their respective careers researching pulsed microwave frequencies as “stealth WARFARE WEAPONS”.

They know whereof they speak. Why are we not listening?

– and why are we not holding “the liars, the ‘Science-by-Declaration”, “fake-science” propagandists running both government and corporations” accountable?

Why are we not holding their feet to the fire?

Why are we repeatedly vote them back into “offices of authority?”

Please take this information, and this issue seriously, i.h.

Forwarded message:

From: Jerry Flynn

Sent: April-30-17

To: Jessica.mcdonald@bchydro.com; greg.reimer@bchydro.com

Subject: Barrie Trower – pulsed frequencies are dangerous to the human brain

Please share with others as you see fit.

Re: Low-Level (weak), Non-thermal, Pulsed Microwave Radiation Distinguished British physicist and ex-UK military specialist in Electronic Warfare, Barrie Trower, asked me to share his personally-obtained information with those interested. First, though, readers are encouraged to read what engineers from world-famous MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) say regarding the human brain and how relatively fragile/delicate it is.
MIT engineer comments include, in part:


1) “Radio waves and brain waves are both forms of electromagnetic radiation, i.e., waves of energy that travel at the speed of light. The main difference between them is their “frequency” i.e., how often each ‘wave’ peaks and troughs in a second. (Think of North American residential electricity which has a “frequency” of 60 waves or Hertz per second, which we refer to as “60 Hz”.)

2) Whereas radio waves (says MIT) constitute frequencies in the 10 Hz to 300-million Hz range (i.e., between 10 and 300-million oscillations per second), a human brain uses frequencies in the 10 Hz to 100 Hz range (i.e., between 10 and 100 oscillations per second).

3) Relative Signal Strength (or Power Density). Brain waves are so weak, they are hardly measurable at all.
For comparison, says MIT engineer Pantazis, “The magnetic field of the earth is just strong enough to move the needle of a compass. Signals from the brain are a billionth of that strength.”
[This is what corrupt governments and industry don’t want us to know/realize – Jerry Flynn]

Now back to Barrie Trower. His letter says: “Initially, all systems “pulsed”. However, when it was realized that stealth microwave warfare relies on entrainment of a brain from such pulses, now being used as a domestic instrument, the pulses had to be re-named as “modulations”.
The difference between them is infinitesimally small, but the effect is just the same. Only the name has changed. I believe that this explains the dramatic changes in behavior we are now witnessing – group suicides, disruption in schools, aggression and so on.”
Over the years, Barrie Trower compiled a list of known entrainment responses (followed by long-term potentiation) from these microwaves. He says: “It should be appreciated that each person will respond slightly differently, although the same areas of brain / temporal / amygdaloid temporal / marotid / etc. will remain the same.”

Pulse/Modulations per second – Possible Result:

1 – Heartbeat Rhythm

1-3 – Sleep Pattern

3-5 – Paranoia / Hallucinations / Amnesia / Illusions / Drowsiness “Absent’ feeling

6-7 – Depression / Suicidal Feelings / Visual Distortion / Confusion

8-11 – Cannot Relax / Feeling Unwell / Unhappy

11-13 – Anger / Manic Behaviour / Problems with Movement / Flashes / Loss of Appetite

14-18 – Small Seizures/Disturbed Orientation/Auditory/Visual Hallucinations

18+ – Inability to make decisions/Sensory problems (sight/touch/sound)

24+** – Confusion/Flickering/flashing lights/Dizziness

35+ – Mania/Hyperactivity

40+ – Anxiety/Sleep disturbance/Reaction time slowed/Unable to make decisions.”

** It is worth mentioning that a mobile phone with a pulse/modulation frequency at 25 could act directly on visual sight (if being held at the head) or heartbeat (if in a chest pocket).
A pulsed frequency of 25 can disrupt both visual and heart neurotransmitters.

Clearly a susceptible person may have any combination of these. Electro-hypersensitive persons may recognize many of their own symptoms. My work on EHS and the brain can be found on . http://www.mastsanity.org

I think the problem is that young Governments and young communications engineers have no knowledge of Cold War warfare and don’t know who to ask: even if they did, the Government would probably be in denial.
The situation is a mess, made worse by greed.

If anyone would like clarification of any of the foregoing, or I can help in any way, please let me know.
Signed Barrie Trower,
3 Flowers Meadow, Liverton, Devon, TQ12 6UP,


James G (“Jerry”) Flynn, Captain (retired)

PS. Interestingly, BC Hydro’s own TETRA system pulses at 17.64 Hz right smack in the middle of the human brain’s frequencies! It’s ‘carrier’ frequency is just under 400 MHz, which is dangerous in its own right, but it is the “pulse’ frequency that should concern BC Hydro, its unsuspecting employees, who are obliged to use TETRA, and those who work and/or live in such an environment. Remember, it takes about 10 years or more for serious illnesses to appear.

“Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”  –

Martin Luther King, Jr.


1. Smart Meters will not deliver value for money.

2. We should not expect any reduction in cost to the average consumer. In fact, people in the USA and Canada who already have Smart Meters have usually found that they bills have risen, partly because the meters have to be paid for out of revenue and partly because many people (particularly the poor and elderly) will not understand the complex tariffs. Past experience in the UK has shown that utility companies, when given the opportunity to use complex tariffs, use them to their own advantage. However, any potential benefits will be more than outweighed by the known and predicted health effects from being exposed 24/7 to intermittent microwave radiation.

3. There have been no truly successful implementations of Smart Meters in other countries because of their deleterious effects on health. Many users in the USA and Canada have experienced serious effects on their health, including severe headaches, tinnitus, dizziness, nausea and poor sleep following their installation. The mechanisms of these effects are now known, which may be regarded as further evidence that they are real.

4. Effects on the inner ear

Tinnitus, dizziness and nausea are due to false activation of the sensitive “hair cells” of the inner ear. When it occurs in those of the cochlea, it can cause tinnitus (false sensations of sound). These hair cells can detect sound of as little as a billionth of a watt by first converting it to electrical signals that then trigger nerve impulses that are sent to the brain. They are also sensitive, even to weak pulsed microwaves.

When this occurs in the hair cells of the vestibular system (the part of the inner ear concerned with balance) they too send false signals to the brain, causing dizziness, loss of balance and symptoms of motion sickness, including nausea. These can be very debilitating.

5. Effects on the brain itself are also due to the pulsed microwave radiation interfering with its normal electrical activity by generating extra by false nerve impulses. This can result in brain hyperactivity, stress headaches and a reduced ability to concentrate (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)).

6. Autism can occur when ADHD occurs in the brain of the foetus and/or children under about 18 months. It can interfere with normal learning during this relatively brief period when the brain is concerned primarily with recognizing body language, other peoples’ emotions, basic communication skills and social interactions. At the end of this period, what the child has learnt become hard-wired into its psyche and cannot easily be added to later. This can result in one of a whole range of autistic spectrum disorders in which the child lacks one or more communications skills (often with other disorders) and is usually irreversible.

7. Microwave exposure has been linked to a fifty-fold increase in autism since the advent of mobile phones, cordless phones and their respective base stations. About one child in fifty is now likely to be at least partially autistic and the annual economic cost of autism in the UK has been estimated by workers at King’s College London as being about £27 billion. Wireless Smart Meters can only make this worse. Can the Nation afford it?

8. Other reported long-term effects of pulsed microwaves are obesity and fatigue. Exposure to the radiation from mobile phones and their base stations (circa seven years for living within 100 metres of a base station) is damaging to the thyroid gland, which is in an exposed position in the front of the neck. This results in hypothyroidism, the main symptoms of which are obesity and fatigue. It may be no coincidence that the Western World is currently suffering from an outbreak of obesity and chronic fatigue syndrome that Wireless Smart Meters can only be expected to exacerbate. The economic and health costs of both are also enormous; can we afford them?

9. The disturbing effects of Wireless Smart Meters on sleep and cancer are apparently due to a reduction in melatonin production (a sleep hormone) by the pineal gland in the brain. This is also worrying since it disrupts our natural circadian rhythms. These circadian rhythms also control our immune systems, which are normally most active during what the body clock “thinks” is night (the subjective night). Similar disruption of the circadian rhythms of shift workers and people regularly exposed to light at night has been found to give rise to cardiac problems and reduced immunity to diseases. There is also a more than doubled risk of getting several forms of cancer as the immune system fails to dispose of aberrant cancer cells from various sources. Exposure to light at night is recognized by the World Health Organisation as being a Group 2A carcinogen (probably carcinogenic). We can therefore expect the current Group 2B status of wireless Smart meters to be elevated to Group 2A. Is the Government or Power Industry happy to take this risk with every household in the land? I hope not.

9. The situation is potentially worse in the UK than in the USA and Canada, where the meters are usually on the outside of houses and relatively little power is needed to transmit the signal. In the UK, most meters are either under the stairs; i.e. in the centre of the house or in the basement, so a much higher signal strength is needed to reach the base station. Therefore our own exposure will be that much greater and the symptoms likely to be worse.

10. Vulnerable customers should certainly not be allocated wireless smart meters,nor should charities be encouraged to support them. There will inevitably be litigation that charities may not be able to afford when their effects of health become fully recognized.

11. The main pitfall in the introduction of wireless smart meters is the effects of their regular radiation pattern (especially at night) on the health of consumers. If you must have wireless smart meters for billing purposes, they should be restricted to one transmission per day and even that should not occur at night.

12. However, it would be far better to use a wired of fibre optic connection using the telephone or broadband connections, which virtually every household already has.

13. DECC is not giving the public the necessary information to enable it to decide on the safety of smart meters, particularly their likely effects on cancer and other health concerns. Either it does not know about them or it has been badly misinformed.

14. There are thousands of peer-reviewed scientific papers showing biological effects from electromagnetic fields (including microwaves) that may be orders of magnitude below official safety standards (these only measure the short term heating effects). See www.bioinitiative.org <http://www.bioinitiative.org/> . Compliance with these standards cannot therefore be taken as an indication of safety. The public should be informed of this so that they can make a sensible and fully informed decision about the safety of wireless smart meters.

14. To carry out compulsory mass exposure to pulsed microwave radiation without the fully informed consent of the people affected is in contravention of the Nuremberg code.

The question of security of supply has not been adequately addressed. Any wireless connection is vulnerable to electromagnetic interference such as that from solar flares, not to mention deliberate attempts at hacking by potential enemies (remember the Stuxnet virus, which destroyed the centrifuges needed for the Iranian nuclear program). Similar attacks on our smart meter system or the intense magnetic fields from a direct hit by the radiation from a solar flare could destroy the electronics of our wireless smart meters (which are designed to fail to the off position) so that the whole nation could be in darkness and without power. If that happened, it could be months if not longer before the meters were replaced and power restored. The likelihood that the meters will be outsourced from another country (probably from China) that will be aware of any vulnerability does little to inspire confidence in our procurement policies.

In conclusion, to go ahead with this wireless smart meter program can at best be described as foolhardy and at worst a recipe for National Suicide.

Dr Andrew Goldsworthy
Lecturer in Biology (retired
Imperial College London

Update 2017-04-30 Mining of data from smeters illegal. Data is for billing purposes only — former privacy commissioner Posted May 2/17

Written and shared by Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters, www.stopsmartmetersbc.com

1)    A press release sent by Dr. Meg Sears after the CBC report on cell phones. Health Canada is not doing its duty for the Canadian public and Health Min. Dr. Philpott must be held responsible if this dereliction of duty is allowed to continue.  For all of us who wrote to her and got no response, and for those who did not write to her after the CBC program in which health Canada said cell phone exposure is safe, we must write again and keep writing, phoning, visiting her office and our MPs’ offices. Remember what Health Can. told Canadians on the CBC program:

But worst of all is the dangerously misleading statement told, blatantly, by Health Canada that is included in this screen shot. “EVEN IF A SMALL CHILD WERE EXPOSED TO A CELL PHONE… 24 HOURS A DAY, 365 DAYS A YEAR … THERE WOULD BE NO ADVERSE HEALTH EFFCT.”

As Commonly Used, Cell Phones Exceed Canada’s Radiation Exposure Limits – CBC Investigation

“Tumours are also being seen in locations where phones were habitually stored such as the breast – something that is worth tracking. When asked about reporting ill effects associated with wireless devices, Health Canada merely indicated that problems should be reported online, as for other consumer products. “Surely a tumour mirroring where a cell phone was used or stored should be reported to Health Canada differently from a defunct toaster,” observed Sears. “This important medical information needs to be collected.””


2)    Former Ontario Privacy Commissioner Dr. Cavoukian warns that mining data from smeters is illegal. Data must be used only for billing purposes.

Privacy violation at heart of city’s potential plan to ‘mine’ smart meters: Expert

Information on how much water is used or electricity consumed can only be collected and used for the purpose originally intended – paying bills – and it’s unacceptable to use it for a secondary purpose, she said.”


3)    Please see below a letter from Jerry Flynn relaying info from Barrie Trower, formerly of Britain’s M-I 5.


From: Dennis and Sharon Noble [mailto:dsnoble@shaw.ca]
Sent: April 30, 2017 12:53 PM
To: Hon. Jane Philpott (jane.philpott@canada.ca) <jane.philpott@canada.ca>
Cc: ‘pm@pm.gc.ca’ <pm@pm.gc.ca>; Wendy Mesley <marketplace@cbc.ca>; randall.garrison@parl.gc.ca; ‘elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca’ <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>; ‘meg@preventcancernow.ca’ <meg@preventcancernow.ca>
Subject: Health Canada misleading public on critical issue

Dear Hon. Dr. Philpott,

I have yet to receive your response to my letter of March 25.  This topic is important and is not going away; I and many concerned Canadians are not going away.

I believe that Health Canada is derelict in its duty to protect the safety of Canadians when it misrepresents what many independent scientists are warning: Prolonged exposure to even low levels of electromagnetic radiation emitted by wireless devices like cell phones, wifi, and smart meters can cause serious health problems. And children are especially vulnerable.

As Minister of Health, you are responsible for Health Canada and, therefore, for the statement made on Health Canada’s website and on CBC’s program on March 24, 2017. What is the basis for the statement that children can be exposed to a cell phone, even sleep with it, every day all day, and have no adverse health effect?

I await your response.


Sharon Noble

Victoria, BC 

From: Dennis and Sharon Noble [mailto:dsnoble@shaw.ca]
Sent: March 25, 2017 6:15 PM
To: Hon. Jane Philpott (jane.philpott@canada.ca) <jane.philpott@canada.ca>
Cc: ‘pm@pm.gc.ca’ <pm@pm.gc.ca>; Wendy Mesley <marketplace@cbc.ca>; randall.garrison@parl.gc.ca; ‘elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca’ <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>

Subject: Marketplace exposes Health Canada lie

Dear Hon. Health Minister Philpott.

On Friday, March 24, 2017, CBC’s Marketplace broadcast a program called “The secret inside your cellphone” which spoke about how the cell phone industry is misleading its customers.  It exposed how customers are not told about how to use their phones and how Health Canada is failing to protect the public. Due to various constraints, Ms. Mesley couldn’t address all of the issues, but shockingly you did not respond to any of her questions. Marketplace did not have the time to tell people that Health Canada’s guidelines are among the weakest in the world. Even China, Russia and India allow their citizens to be exposed to mere fractions of the levels of RF allowed by Safety Code 6.

But worst of all is the dangerously misleading statement told, blatantly, by Health Canada that is included in this screen shot. “EVEN IF A SMALL CHILD WERE EXPOSED TO A CELL PHONE… 24 HOURS A DAY, 365 DAYS A YEAR … THERE WOULD BE NO ADVERSE HEALTH EFFCT.”  

Based upon the hundreds of studies I’ve read, this statement is a lie. No scientist, even industry scientists, would say that microwave radiation is safe. Minister Philpott, do you support this, and agree that this is the information that should be given to parents who are looking for guidance? 

What is the basis for this statement? Are you willing to put your name to it? If you are not, and if you cannot give me scientific evidence to support this statement then you MUST retract if from the CBC Marketplace program and delete it from all of Health Canada’s references.



With deep concern,

Sharon Noble

From: Jerry Flynn [mailto:jerryjgf@shaw.ca]

Sent: April-30-17 8:18 PM

To: ‘Jessica.mcdonald@bchydro.com’ <Jessica.mcdonald@bchydro.com>; ‘greg.reimer@bchydro.com’ <greg.reimer@bchydro.com>

Subject: Barrie Trower – pulsed frequencies are dangerous to the human brain

Please share with others as you see fit.

Re: Low-Level (weak), Non-thermal, Pulsed Microwave Radiation Distinguished British physicist and ex-UK military specialist in Electronic Warfare, Barrie Trower, asked me to share his personally-obtained information with those interested. First, though, readers are encouraged to read what engineers from world-famous MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) say regarding the human brain and how relatively fragile/delicate it is. MIT engineer comments include, in part:



1)    “Radio waves and brain waves are both forms of electromagnetic

radiation, i.e., waves of energy that travel at the speed of light. The main difference between them is their “frequency” i.e., how often each ‘wave’

peaks and troughs in a second. (Think of North American residential electricity which has a “frequency” of 60 waves or Hertz per second, which we refer to as “60 Hz”.)

2)    Whereas radio waves (says MIT) constitute frequencies in the 10 Hz to

300-million Hz range (i.e., between 10 and 300-million oscillations per second), a human brain uses frequencies in the 10 Hz to 100 Hz range (i.e., between 10 and 100 oscillations per second).

3)    Relative Signal Strength (or Power Density).  Brain waves are so weak,

they are hardly measurable at all. For comparison, says MIT engineer Pantazis, “The magnetic field of the earth is just strong enough to move the needle of a compass. Signals from the brain are a billionth of that strength.” [This is what corrupt governments and industry don’t want us to know/realize – Jerry Flynn]

Now back to Barrie Trower. His letter says: “Initially, all systems “pulsed”. However, when it was realized that stealth microwave warfare relies on entrainment of a brain from such pulses, now being used as a domestic instrument, the pulses had to be re-named as “modulations”. The difference between them is infinitesimally small, but the effect is just the same. Only the name has changed. I believe that this explains the dramatic changes in behavior we are now witnessing – group suicides, disruption in schools, aggression and so on.” Over the years, Barrie Trower compiled a list of known entrainment responses (followed by long-term potentiation) from these microwaves. He says: “It should be appreciated that each person will respond slightly differently, although the same areas of brain / temporal / amygdaloid temporal / marotid / etc. will remain the same.  

Pulse/Modulations per second – Possible Result:

1 – Heartbeat Rhythm

1-3 – Sleep Pattern

3-5 – Paranoia / Hallucinations / Amnesia / Illusions / Drowsiness “Absent’ feeling

6-7 – Depression / Suicidal Feelings / Visual Distortion / Confusion

8-11 – Cannot Relax / Feeling Unwell / Unhappy

11-13 – Anger / Manic Behaviour / Problems with Movement / Flashes / Loss of Appetite

14-18 – Small Seizures/Disturbed Orientation/Auditory/Visual Hallucinations

18+ – Inability to make decisions/Sensory problems (sight/touch/sound)

24+** – Confusion/Flickering/flashing lights/Dizziness

35+ – Mania/Hyperactivity

40+ – Anxiety/Sleep disturbance/Reaction time slowed/Unable to make


** It is worth mentioning that a mobile phone with a pulse/modulation frequency at 25 could act directly on visual sight (if being held at the

head) or heartbeat (if in a chest pocket). A pulsed frequency of 25 can disrupt both visual and heart neurotransmitters.  

Clearly a susceptible person may have any combination of these.

Electro-hypersensitive persons may recognize many of their own symptoms. My work on EHS and the brain can be found on http://www.mastsanity.org.

I think the problem is that young Governments and young communications engineers have no knowledge of Cold War warfare and don’t know who to ask:

even if they did, the Government would probably be in denial. The situation is a mess, made worse by greed.

If anyone would like clarification of any of the foregoing, or I can help in any way, please let me know. Signed Barrie Trower, 3 Flowers Meadow, Liverton, Devon, TQ12 6UP,


James G (“Jerry”) Flynn, Captain (retired)  

PS. Interestingly, BC Hydro’s own TETRA system pulses at 17.64 Hz – right smack in the middle of the human brain’s frequencies! It’s ‘carrier’

frequency is just under 400 MHz, which is dangerous in its own right, but it is the “pulse’ frequency that should concern BC Hydro, its unsuspecting employees, who are obliged to use TETRA, and those who work and/or live in such an environment. Remember, it takes about 10 years or more for serious illnesses to appear.

“Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”

Martin Luther King, Jr.


“But what we need above all is criti­cal citizens, who can spot the difference between technical progress and consumer foolishness: citizens who, as both voters and consumers, remember that democracy once meant rule of the people, not ruling the people.”    Dr. Karl Hecht

Update 2017-04-29 Industry warns of many security flaws in IoT that could cause major harm, even death. posted May 1/17

1)   The information about Berkeley’s “right to know” is being published in various non-RF media.

California Upholds “Right to Know” Warning Consumers of Cancer-Causing Cell Phone Radiation


2)   After more than 8 years of experience in the US with smeters, despite all the claims, no energy has been saved as a result of spending all the money on this dangerous, invasive and expensive gadget.  People don’t change their usage habits just because they can easily see how much energy is being used. Well before smeters, we all knew that a lightbulb uses electricity.

IoT developers can learn from America’s smart meter mistake


3)   Need a new roof that will produce electricity??  He’s comparing to tile roofs. I will attempt to find comparisons to asphalt shingles. 

Tesla’s Solar Roof To Cost Less Than A Regular Roof – Even Before Energy Production, Says Elon Musk



4)   Industry warns that the Internet of Things (IoT) could allow hackers to actually cause serious harm or even death by controlling or manipulating medical devices, or cars, or power supplies. Emphasis that wireless/”smart” technology is far from being secure.

Why puny IoT security could kill sooner rather than later 

Incidents of ransomware is rising and potentially deadly cases of ransomware attacks on hospital networks saw hackers hold sensitive patient data hostage. These hacks directly endangered the lives of patients relying on a functioning hospital network.

With the rise of internet-connected healthcare devices, what happens when hackers gain access to these life-sustaining devices? The outlook is grim: in 2011 one hacker demonstrated his ability to remotely access and shut down insulin pumps within a 300m range.

In 2016 researchers identified security flaws in cardiac defibrillators, meaning that right now healthcare devices could potentially be accessed by hackers.”



Even if all the experts agree, they may well be mistaken.      Bertrand Russell

Update 2017-04-27 A must read tribute about how industry treats real scientists posted April 29/17

1)    Come to Anmore Townhall talking BC Hydro with Rick Glumac (running for MLA) – THU (May/4) at 7pm


2)    People in California continue to organize protests and putting pressure on state politicians to prevent the telecoms from being given the right to install microcells on public property, outside homes, without any control. Please see below, in Letters,  what they’re saying because all of this applies here, too. We must become educated on this and begin to fight for our rights NOW before it’s too late.

3)    An article by Dr. Louis Slesin, Microwave News – a tribute to a man of great integrity, Dr. Narenda Singh.

Peer Review in the Raw

N.P. Singh, the Comet Assay and “Radiation Research”

“This story was 20 years in the making.

If you want to know what it has been like to do research on the potential health effects of cell phone radiation, please read this story. I hope it will change the way you think about the peer review process and the power of entrenched interests to manipulate what gets published in the scientific literature –and, ultimately, shape public opinion.

This story should also help you understand how EMF/EMR research has come to be falsely portrayed as junk science.”



649- No Small Cell Invasion Into Our Neighborhoods!

Share link on social media: http://stopsmartmeters.org/2017/04/19/ca-bill-sb-649-would-force-transmitters-outside-your-home/

(If you live outside of CA we could still use your help- see below!)

California pending legislation SB649 would streamline placement of 5G small cell Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) on electric and light poles in front of businesses and residences. This bill eliminates local control and jurisdiction with regard to DAS placement throughout the state of California. Read more about the bill and take action at the Scientists for Wired Tech site.

Ellen Marks of the California Brain Tumor Association says:


While cities and counties can presently refuse telecommunications equipment on their own property for any reason including health and environmental damage, SB 642 is a sneaky attempt by the wireless industry to change the rules of the game. The bill would strip local governments of their property rights and force them to ignore safety, aesthetic, health and other issues and approve all wireless company applications along public streets and on public properties. The California State Assn. of Counties has written a letter strongly opposing SB 649 that raises these issues.

The wireless industry has made some specious claims in support of the bill, including that “a DAS box is only the size of a pizza box” (this claim was thoroughly debunked here).

SB 649 will be heard at the Governance and Finance Committee TOMORROW, April 26th at 9:30am Rm. 112 at the Capitol in Sacramento.

Opponents of the bill will meet at Starbucks at 8:30 am on 4/26/17: 1123 12th St/L St., Sacramento, CA 95814 ($12/day early bird parking next door on 12th St. near Hyatt Regency). We will meet there and then walk over to the meeting together.


“It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.”   Albert Einstein

Update 2017-04-26 Strong warning about vulnerability of smeters, especially once the zigbee chip is activated. posted April 27/17

1)    A major conference in Greece resulted in the Athens Medical Assoc. making 16 recommendations for reducing exposure to microwave radiation.

Athens Medical Association Recommends Reducing Electromagnetic Wireless Radiation To Protect Public Health 

“Dr. Metsis, among other health issues of wireless communication presented, emphasized the constantly increasing levels of radiation recorded today in many built up areas and cities—levels at which many doctors and scientists repeatedly raise alarms—the rising issue of electromagnetic hypersensitivity in a large number of citizens in most western countries, the setbacks of smart meter installation in private homes already exposed and the dangers of the completely unknown elements in the terahertz frequencies used in the new 5G technology.” 


2)    Non smeter – but many members are sending me very interesting articles about Hydro. Even if this weren’t an election year we should be concerned about how this government has treated our once “jewel in the crown” corporation, BC Hydro. They have plundered and pillaged it, right under our noses.  

BC Hydro’s real debt has grown 1337% under Liberals…Shouldn’t someone call the cops?  By Rafe Mair

http://commonsensecanadian.ca/bc-hydro-real-debt-grown-1337-liberals-shouldnt-someone-call-cops/   (language warning)  and despite all the warnings about Site C, this project continues.


3)    An internet security expert in Australia is warning about the vulnerability of smeters, especially to hackers. And if/when the zigbee chip is activated, (and we have no protection against Hydro saying that as a condition for having electricity that we must allow the zigbee chip to be activated) the “dumb” appliances in the home become vulnerable.

Once a device had been cracked, the report found hackers monitoring real-time electricity usage could learn anything from when the refrigerator was last opened, to what program occupants were watching on television.

Mr Phair said that information would be valuable to burglars looking to monitor when a house was unoccupied.

“When a home has a number of internet-connected devices such as alarms or garage doors, the risk is heightened,” he said.”


4)    An excellent article written by the Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine in 2013.  It gives a terrific overview of the history of EMF research and comparisons about what is happening in other countries vs. North America where the industry rules.



From: Jerry Flynn
Sent: April 26, 2017 2:52 PM
To: mpr@bcgreens.ca
Cc: obg@bcgreens.ca; scott.fraser.MLA@leg.bc.ca; perry.kendall@gov.bc.ca; ‘Christy Clark’ <premier@gov.bc.ca>; ‘John Horgan’ <John.Horgan.MLA@leg.bc.ca>
Subject: Radio / microwave frequency radiation

Hello Alicia,

Before reading this, please take the time to first view: http://www.arizonaadvancedmedicine.com/Articles/2013/June/ElectroSmog.aspx

Now, with the benefit of the above (or the BioInitiative Report 2012), were my wife and I to vote for you in the upcoming election, what is your personal position and, separately, that of BC’s Green Party, with respect to wireless radiation? Specifically, I’m referring to the ‘low-level’ (i.e., weak), pulsed, non-thermal radio / microwave frequency radiation that is emitted by all of today’s so-called consumer wireless products – including baby monitors, as well as ‘smart’ meters and ‘smart’ appliances? Remember, ALL radiation is cumulative; it all adds up.

You possibly are unaware of it but most non-industry scientists in the world believe there is a direct correlation between the explosion of wireless devices in our society over the past 30 years and the corresponding explosion of disease epidemics over that same period of time. http://www.saferemr.com/2015/06/international-scientist-appeal-on.html

Were my wife and I to vote for you, would you be ‘for’ or ‘against’ the following:

a)     Compelling BC’s electric power utilities to exchange – at their earliest and at their sole expense – the ‘smart’ meters they unilaterally elected to install on every home in the province with analogue meters (which emit no radiation)?

b)    Removing Wi-Fi from all kindergartens and schools throughout the province and replacing it with fibre-optic cable?

c)     Removing Wi-Fi from all provincially-owned/operated health care buildings – including hospitals and cancer clinics – in the province:?

d)    Removing Wi-Fi and Wi-MAX zones from all public buildings throughout the province – including public parks?

e)     Encouraging the removal of all Bluetooth installations from cars and other vehicles throughout the province?

f)      Removing Wi-Fi from publicly-owned vehicles including transit systems throughout BC

g)     Discourage the siting of cell phone towers from residential developments, and, as much as legally possible, forbid them from being installed on or near school property?

h)    Prevent cordless phones (which ‘pulse’ 24-hours a day, every day, never shutting off) being sold in British Columbia?

I will no longer vote for the BC Liberals or the NDP as both have proven to be willfully ignorant of the topic and/or not interested in touching it. Either we vote for you or we abstain. Your reply will tell us that which we must do.


James G.(“Jerry”) Flynn, Captain (retired)  


“The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do.”   B.F. Skinner


Brain Hacking to addict users! posted April 25/17


Silicon Valley is engineering your phone, apps and social media to get you hooked, says a former Google product manager. Anderson Cooper reports

SUZANNE Speaks: Smart Meters posted April 24/17

Ever heard of a smart meter? What is it? It reads your power consumption without requiring anyone to be home, which is supposed to make things easier, except for one thing: it produces an electromagnetic field over your entire house. Watch this week’s NEW episode, SUZANNE Speaks: Smart Meters, to learn about the dangers and what you can do to protect yourself!

Update 2017-04-23 Kamloops to get Canada’s first “solar road” Wifi Damage proof available! Posted April 24/17

1)    More cities and communities in Calif. opposing the regulation re microcells.   

[Burbank, California, USA]


[American Planning Association (APA California), the League of California Cities (LCC), the Urban Counties of California (UCC), the Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC), and Protect our Local Streets Coalition (POLS), California, USA] –   http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/NoticeOfOppositionToSB649-WirelessTelecomFacilities-APA-CA-LCC-UCC-RCRC-POLS-Mar.28-2017.pdf

2)    It seems we will never run out of new projects to protest over which to raise concerns. Now the first SOLAR ROAD in Canada coming to Kamloops. What about spending the money on needed fix of what I’ve been told are pretty bad roads in the area?  Building biologists and others with expert information should get to the university and profs to explain the ramifications of this. These techies obviously don’t realize the harm in this junk and they need to be educated.

“The first solar road in Canada will be built this summer at the Thompson Rivers University campus in Kamloops.

The Solar Compass Project is due to be installed in June, a year later than expected as newer technology was made available after plans were made.”


3)    Someone in California put together a website hoping it would provide helpful references.  Whenever someone says there is no evidence that RF radiation is harmful, you might send the “irradiated” link.


You can access the document for free by going here: https://wirelessaction.wordpress.com/irradiated/ and clicking the “Irradiated” link.

My goal was to create an easily accessible and printable, navigable document with lots of evidence in one place. There are news articles and actual research sprinkled throughout the document. There is a general section about RF, as well as specific sections about smart meters, cell phones, Wi-Fi, technology in schools, landlines, and electrohypersensitive individuals,

There are also additional resources in the Appendix section at the bottom 

I’ve also combined all the documents in the LAUSD testimony and attached them below on that same page as well.

Enjoy! Hope this aids some of you in your fight against RF injustice!

4)    Ted Archibald, a long time and key member of the Coalition, gave a presentation to the City of Mission council regarding cell towers.  The telecom company says more traffic is requiring more cell towers. What about all the microcells – can’t they handle the traffic? Does each company have to have transmitters in every neighbourhood?  These councillors and Mayor need to be educated on the dangers of allowing these things in residential areas or near schools.  The owner of the property needs to know that he will be held liable when he is sued for causing someone cancer, like the case in Italy and the other in India. It will happen and there will be no insurance to cover the risk,


pg. A7 

5)    Groups in Pennsylvania are preparing to fight the prepaid option for electricity. Please their “points” in Letters.  We should be paying attention because this could be something being planned by Hydro and/or FortisBC.  This program is all for their benefit, and prepaid programs certainly would be that.


Philadelphia, PA  19104

What is PECO’s Prepaid Meter Pilot Program?

•        PECO has proposed to offer electric service through prepaid meters, similar to prepaid cell phones. Prepaid meter programs are also known as advance payments programs.

•        It is a “pilot” program only available to 2,000 customers.

•        Under the program, customers would load payment to their PECO account before usage.

•        When the payment runs out, customers must load more money onto their account or service will be shut off.

•        This program would not be available to low-income customers (customers with income below 150% FPL).

Why is the Prepaid Meter Pilot bad for customers?

•        Customers with prepaid service will lose access to important protections, including:

o        Medical certifications

o        10-day paper termination notice

o        Winter moratorium on shut off

o        Affordable payment agreements

•        The pilot program will only be available to customers who volunteer, but it will likely lead to a larger scale PECO program and similar programs across the state.

•        Prepaid meter programs are known to attract vulnerable and payment-troubled customers.

•        These customers will be harmed most by losing customer protections.

Testifying at the Hearing

Anyone can testify at the hearing. PECO and other parties will have the opportunity to ask you questions after you testify.  You can use these sample talking points to prepare your statement.

Sample Talking Points

•        PECO’s prepaid meter program is bad for customers because it forces customers to give up important protections.

•        I may not choose to participate myself, but am concerned for my community members who have trouble paying their bills in full every month and could be attracted to this plan.

•        Electric service is already unaffordable for struggling families. Vulnerable PECO customers need affordable bills and payment assistance, not dangerous prepaid meter service. 

•        This program will put vulnerable customers at risk because it will allow for more winter shut offs, provide limited payment arrangements, and make it harder to access medical certifications.

Come speak out – don’t let PECO take away important consumer rights!


“Get up, stand up: stand up for your rights!
Get up, stand up: don’t give up the fight!”    
Bob Marley


Arizona Replacing All Smart Meters! posted April 21/17

Update 2017-04-20 Utility replacing all smeters.

1)    Not smeter or RF:  More of our money wasted by Hydro and Clark.  Regardless of party affiliation, this is important information that I believe we should all present to the candidates asking for our votes. We can’t afford Site C and it seems from much independent study, including the initial panel’s whose recommendations were ignored, we don’t need it. Granted much of the damage has been done already to the area and can’t be “undone”, but more damage done by flooding can be prevented, as well as the drainage of our tax dollars to the corporations.


2)    See below in Letters an email I received about a small utility in Arizona replacing all of its smeters. With the short lifespan, I bet hydro is beginning to replace its meters and we’ll never know. We too have been told by hydro and Fortis BC that the smeters will last 20 years and try to make it sound as if that is how long the analogs last. Total misrepresentation. 



Epic Fail! – Navopache Electric Coop Replacing All 40,000 “Smart” Meters After Just a Few Years
Information & Perspective by X
Sedona, Arizona ~ April 20, 2017


          Yesterday I received news that Navopache Electric Coop, a utility that serves customers in the White Mountains of eastern Arizona and western New Mexico, is replacing all of its Elster brand “smart” meters with Landis & Gyr “smart” meters.

Upon hearing the news, I phoned Navopache. The person I spoke with said initially that Navopache was “upgrading” their meters and replacing all 40,000 of them. In our subsequent conversation she said the Elster meters had “bugs” and communication problems. She also said the Elsters were only about 3 years old.

What a colossal waste! If Navopache had stuck with analog meters, those much less expensive and reliable analog meters would still be in service today, tomorrow and for decades to come.

This Navopache news has relevance to the current APS rate case because a fraudulent 20 year “smart” meter service life is being proposed by APS, ACC Staff and the Residential Utility Consumer Office (RUCO). RUCO, by the way, is supposed to represent residential customers in the rate case but in reality represents no one but RUCO. (To see how badly RUCO has lied and sold us out in the APS rate case in order to further RUCO’s elitist, social engineering agenda, see pages 9 to 15 of my testimony here: http://docket.images.azcc.gov/0000179034.pdf . ACC Staff’s lies are detailed at pages 3 to 9.)

Because I am an Intervenor in the APS rate case, I get to do discovery. I get to ask APS questions. Via discovery, I found that APS’s Elster meters are lasting about as long as Navopache’s. From my testimony:

At APS’s Response to Woodward’s data request 2.12, APS admits thousands of meters failed to communicate and, after an average life of just 4 years, were replaced as follows:

2014 – 19,203 meters replaced
2015 – 22,287 meters replaced
2016 (As of 10/2016) – 20,172 meters replaced

This failure to communicate is a problem that is ongoing. APS: “This specific communication issue was first identified in 2014 and continues to be an issue today, albeit a minimal one.” Some 20,000 meters failing every year is a “minimal issue?”

          I guess when you have lax regulators along with a monopoly on 1.25 million customers like APS does, then the ongoing waste of 20,000 failed “smart” meters per year is nothing to worry about. However, when you have only 40,000 meters to begin with like Navopache does, a failure rate like APS’s wipes out your entire meter stock quickly.

What’s amazing is how Navopache didn’t learn a thing from the epic failure, but instead Navopache is just replacing one brand with another. What was that definition of insanity most of us have heard, doing the same thing and expecting a different result?

“Smart” meters simply do not last. Because actual metering is only one fifth of what a “smart” meter does, the I.R.S. classifies them as a computer with only a 6 year life. Indeed, a utility executive testifying before the U.S. Congress said they only last 5 to 7 years. You can read about that as well as details of tens of thousands of other APS “smart” meter failures, as well as the 140,000 that went obsolete after less than 10 years, at pages 40 to 46 of this testimony: http://docket.images.azcc.gov/0000178628.pdf . 

          Undaunted, and as such reminding me very much of the Black Knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail, Navopache claims at its website (and in ALL CAPS to make certain we are persuaded) that “smart” meters offer “improved EFFICIENCY,” “improved RELIABILITY,” and “improved AFFORDABILITY.” Sure. Except when they don’t.

By the way, this is the same Navopache Electric Coop that said their “smart” meters transmit only once every four hours. Navopache Caught Lying is a YouTube I did 3 years ago of a Navopache “smart” meter shortly after it was installed. I guess no one told it that it was only supposed to transmit once every four hours because, like utility lying about “smart” meters, it never stops.


“Our Society is run by insane people for insane objectives. We are being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I m liable to be put away as insane for expressing that.

That’s what is insane about it…”John Lennon

B.C. Quietly Grants Mount Polley Mine Permit to Pipe Mine Waste Directly Into Quesnel Lake posted April 20/17

 Update 2017-04-15 Cybersecurity: Who controls the switch? posted April 17/17

1)    A technical paper but well-worth the effort to understand the evidence that confirms the relationship between cell phone/cordless phone usage and brain cancers, and the methods used by industry-affiliated researchers to mislead.

“Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation”


2)    A rhetorical debate about the Supreme Court Decision in India in which a cell tower held to be responsible for one man’s cancer. It is argued that the precautionary principle is being followed in the manner intended, putting the onus on the company to prove that the RF radiation is safe rather than force the victim to prove it is dangerous. The final decision is yet to be made, but the precautionary principle has been recognized by Canada – but only formally with regard to the environment (and that may no longer be the case).

“The correlation between harmful radiation from the cell phone tower and Tiwari’s cancer is yet to be proved conclusively; but the court apparently thought that the BSNL had so far failed to prove that its radiation is safe, or could not have caused Tiwari’s cancer, as the burden is upon them to show proof under the precautionary principle.”


3)    Cybersecurity and its complexities.  The smeters are “shockingly vulnerable” and, as others have warned, are the entry points for attacks to the grid. This is an excellent point to make at election meetings. Does any politician even know about this issue? I doubt it.  Was it investigated before the contract with ITRON was signed? Apparently the fire issue wasn’t so why would security?

“Who Controls the Off Switch?”


          This information warning about privacy and security vulnerabilities was given to the UK govt. years ago and, it is feared, nothing has changed.

                   “Government warned of smart meter security threat back in 2012”

““The DCC will have the ability to disable any meter remotely, a facility that creates a significant cyber security threat in the form of enabling an attacker – insider or outsider – to centrally disrupt or otherwise interfere with energy supplies,” said the report.”


4)    Eye doctors are now becoming aware of and concerned about blue light from screens.  Remember this software program that can reduce the blue light on your computer. https://justgetflux.com/

“Battling Blue Light

For years, researchers have studied the association between dysfunctional sleep-wake cycles and other health problems, such as diabetes and some forms of cancer. The systemic effect of blue light is something Bryan Rogoff, O.D., a private practice consultant in the Washington, D.C./Baltimore area, always talks to his clients about, especially for different practice models. As doctors of optometry join accountable care groups and move toward a coordinated care model, Dr. Rogoff urges them to screen patients for blue light eye damage—and conduct a thorough case history that incorporates patients’ sleep patterns—and how it relates to metabolic and cardiovascular changes that affect their bodies.”



Happy Easter.

EMF cause for Cancer and bee declines!? Posted April 16/17

1)   A few weeks ago I sent information about a study requesting beekeepers to record information. Here is more information about this study and why it’s being done. The correlation between the colony collapse problem being noted and the proliferation of wireless devices with the resultant increase of EMR throughout our environment could very much be more than a coincidence. Please share with any beekeepers you know.

Is electromagnetism one of the causes of the CCD? A work plan for testing this hypothesis

Bees may be particularly affected by manmade electromagnetism [21,22,23]. They have magnetite in their brain, a compound which reacts to magnetism. While flying, they can cross electromagnetic fields of high intensity generated by relay antenna and power lines. When crossing such electromagnetic fields, bees may no longer remember their way, may no longer fly in the correct direction, and may become unable to go back to their hive. Alone, a bee cannot live; it dies in about two days, far from its hive. Note that birds are also affected by EMF [26]. Since moreover most of them eat insects, at least during a part of the year, the actual decrease of their numbers finds here a plausible explanation.”


2)   In India there have been efforts to reduce the number of cell towers, with Dr. Girish Kumar being on the forefront trying to educate politicians and the public. A legal fight by someone who blames a cell tower for his cancer has been won. The court ordered the cell tower removed within days. India’s allowable levels of RF are mere fractions of Canada’s via Safety Code 6. 

“Radiation from the BSNL tower, less than 50 metres from the house where he worked, afflicted him with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma caused by continuous and prolonged exposure to radiation, Tiwari complained.

In a recent order, a bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Navin Sinha said, “We direct that the particular mobile tower shall be deactivated by BSNL within seven days from today.” The tower will be the first to be closed on an individual’s petition alleging harmful radiation.”



“When there is a doubt, when it comes to our children, there is no doubt.”     Haifa’s mayor, Yona Yahav

Update 2017-04-13 Resistance to microcells growing in California posted April 15/17

Written and shared by Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters, www.stopsmartmetersbc.com

1)     In California the resistance to the microcells is growing. The County of Santa Cruz is opposing a proposed law that would take significant power from municipalities.




2)    Be aware that Samsung is not the only “dumb” TV that can be remotely controlled to invade your privacy.  

Researcher: 90% Of ‘Smart’ TVs Can Be Compromised Remotely


3)    From a member re. blue light and wifi on BC Ferries. Many people who are sensitive cannot enjoy a ferry ride from the islands. Now the plans are to increase wifi in the waiting areas for those walking on.  Why is this needed? Will there be a separate area for those who cannot or do not want to be exposed to wifi?

“Spoke with my ophthalmologist the other re sunglasses in general and blue light in particular.  Her recommendation is the “colour” FL-41 basically a brown orange, as the best to deal with blue light.  The amount of filtering would of course depend on the use.  It appear 35% helps reduce light induced migraines which would probably be good for indoor use on a computer (how much of peoples “headaches” on a computer and tvs etc are not radiation induced but light induced 

Noticed the just released BCLib platform includes $1 million to downgrade BCFerries waiting rooms with more wifi. A letter (more effective than an email) to their headquarters may help block this plan.

If each time a politician promotes the use of witless  they received many letters of protests we might be able to create a “Pavlov’s dog” type reaction on their part to anything wireless.  When  I write to BCFerries re wireless I usually suggest if they really need to provide wireless  to limit it to the business lounge where they can charge people for the use of it, the radiation is limited to a small area of the ship and will be easier and cheaper to install – the same practice could be used in the waiting room.  It is interesting to note they do not have wifi in the crews quarters.”

4)    Freedom Mobile has submitted an application to Langford City Council for a new cell tower in the downtown area very near apartments and homes. Langford council has a very weak policy and now is asking for more time to allow residents to respond. I think it is wonderful that everyone who was asked to allow the tower on their property refused. Word is getting around!!  People in Langford need to organize. Flyers should be available from C4ST.org 

Langford cell tower proposal triggers larger debate

“Verigin noted BC Hydro has strict criteria on which poles can be used by telecommunication companies, including limiting one company to each. “Of the poles that fit that criteria (in this area), there are no poles available,” she said.

The proposed site was the seventh considered by the company, she added, but no agreement could be reached with any of the other property owners. “Unfortunately, there are no roof tops available, so we’ve had to default to this last option,” she said, adding, “we have made an effort to reduce visibility.”


5)    US FCC bans cell phone usage during flight. No reason given but a victory in the battle to reduce the level of EMR in these faraday cages.

The FCC is reversing its proposal to allow cellphone use on planes



I don’t want the updates to become a political platform for any of the parties. The only reason I shared the email last night was to encourage people to speak with solicitors and candidates about the issues re. wifi, smeters and microcells and RF dangers in general. Prior statements by Andrew Weaver, which I have shared, raises concern for me about his willingness to re-consider the dangers of RF, but in the interest of fairness I am sharing one last email, as requested by a member.  We need to vote in MLAs who will demand that the real information be provided to the public about RF, wifi in schools and smeters. 

“On the story about the two Green Party members who came to your door. We know and have been to our Green Party Rep’s community meetings. She (Sonia Furstenau), is informed and well aware of the EMF/Smart meter issues. We will be voting green as we feel confident she is taking this issue seriously. Please forward this on as I think Andrew Weaver will start taking this issue seriously as well. As far as I know, it’s our best option  – Clark is promising more wifi, Horgan is a fence rider and has done nothing re. listening to issues over the last three years regarding Smeters. I am focusing on educating the Greens as I feel it is our best option.”


“A politician thinks of the next election. A leader thinks of the next generation.” – Bernie Sanders

Subject: Environmental Illness posted April 15/17


There are many environmental factors that contribute to illnesses and symptoms. It’s vitally important to understand how you and your loved ones can protect and strengthen yourselves against them or minimize exposure in the first place. Join Anthony William in this episode to learn about the triggers of environmental illness.

Update 2017-04-11 Dr. Sam Milham “Smart meters are a public health hazard” posted April 12/17

1)    Testimony given by Dr. Sam Milham about the various ways smeters pose public health risks.

Dr. Samuel Milham: “Smart meters are a public health hazard.”

“Because it is at the front end of a building’s wiring, the dirty electricity from the smart meter’s SMPS has a gateway into that building’s wiring, and also into the earth via the house ground.  The house wiring acts as an antenna and the fields capacitively couple to the body through the air within 6 to 8 feet of the house wiring or extension cords plugged into the outlets. …” 


2)    Now that Dr. Johansson is retiring, he has shared some of his studies that many have not seen before.

15 Studies showing “remarkable” changes in the skin and other effects from EMF and RF by Olle Johansson – 1990 to 2001:


3)    Looking for Creative Beings to be a part of a fun Performance Art piece to be performed on the afternoon of Earth Day on Salt Spring on Sunday, April 23. The subject: Small Cells & EMF Pollution. Acting experience is not required, simply a willingness to create a prop or costume and be present. 

The small cells being placing on utility poles by homes across BC pose biological harm to bees, trees, and all living beings. If you don’t know what small cells are and why we need to act on this issue now, take a peek at this short music video:  Cellular Deception

The beautiful thing about expressing social issues through art is that we can sidestep polarity and touch people’s hearts. It would be wonderful to make a creative statement at Earth Day to make the issue tangible. Performance specifics will be shared with those who are interested.

For more Info contact Oona at oonasong@yahoo.com

4)    The Tyee is writing articles about the election issues and today’s issue has 117 Liberal boondoggles and falsehoods. I don’t see the smeter program, so I hope some will write to the Tyee and suggest this be added. Contacts are at https://thetyee.ca/About/Contact/

117 BC Liberal Falsehoods, Boondoggles and Scandals: The Complete List 


5)     Marg Friesen from Manitoba has taken on the mighty task of cataloguing the many peer-reviewed studies that the industry, Health Canada, WHO, and Perry Kendall want to ignore. The links below provide excellent references and I hope you will include some of these links when you write to any of the health agencies or officials who are denying that RF causes harm.  Many thanks to Marg.







For those who don’t recognize this candidate’s name, he was the conservation officer who refused to kill 2 bear cubs – and was reprimanded as a consequence.

From:  X
Sent: April 10, 2017 1:57 PM
To: Bryce.Casavant@bcndp.ca
Subject: Meter readers paid $.34 per meter. Why are the legacy fees $64.80 per read?
  Written and shared by Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters, www.stopsmartmetersbc.com  

Hello Bryce,

Congratulations on standing for election for the NDP in the riding of Oak Bay Gordon Head.

I have been following with interest your high energy campaign thus far. I am voting for you as is my husband. And we are donors to your campaign  as well. 

Please see below the mention by Sharon Noble of the Stop Smart Meters Coalition about the so-called legacy fees that we are being charged. Sharon writes to members each day about the dangers of smart meters. Her articles and comments come from experts all over North America, Europe and elsewhere in the world.

  I am wondering if you are aware of this huge cash grab that BC Hydro has forced on those of us in BC who refused so-called’ smart meters’ a few years ago?  Those of us and there are many in BC who refused for health and for security reasons to have our analog meters replaced have been hit with  additional charges on our hydro bills of $ 32.40 per month as a penalty for not having new meters mounted on our homes.

Could you please tell us what is your policy and the policy of the BC NDP about this punitive fee?

The current MLA for this riding has not committed himself to dealing with this punitive and most unfair additional cost on top of our hydro bills.

I would very much appreciate a response from you on this issue.  And  good luck as we attempt to toss out of office this unfeeling government. They have been in power much too long.

Kind regards,



“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.”  Thomas Jefferson.

Cdsapi’s Added Comment: Understanding what Glyphosate really does!   As the devastating agent of Mass Health Destruction posted April 10/17

Soil Health, Intercellular Communication and Their Effects on Human Health:

A Special Interview With Dr. Zach Bush

By Dr. Joseph Mercola

I am begging everyone to listen to this interview!!!  The content is really that important.

This is an interview that really lays out the science that the Establishment refuses to recognize because it upsets the embedded Vested Interests that are presently running the “economic system”.

However it is the science that we not only have to acknowledged  –  we have to understand and adopt this science RIGHT AWAY if humanity is going to survive the present exponential explosion in disease and  catastrophic crumbling health.

The transcript is attached in 8 1/2 by 11 format.
However, listening to the interview is definitely preferable for clarity and impact.

Let us no longer remain “the species that engineers and finances its own destruction and does so in the name of “Economic Necessity”.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgKlX6rC4EQ&feature=youtu.be

Transcript: http://mercola.fileburst.com/PDF/ExpertInterviewTranscripts/Interview-ZachBush-SoilHealthIntercellularCommunicatiOnAndTheirEffects.pdf

Students do WIFI EMF experiment! Posted April 5/17

Foreign researchers are extremely excited for a biology project from five 9th grade girls.

Researchers from England, Holland and Sweden have shown great interest in the five girls’ biology experiments.

Take 400 Cress seeds and place them into 12 trays. Then place six trays in two rooms at the same temperature. Give them the same amount of water and sun over 12 days, and remember to expose half of them to mobile [Wi-Fi] radiation.

Update 2017-04-01 A research project for bee keepers re. RF/EMR posted April 3/17

 1)    Many studies have shown that bees are affected by and react to RF radiation. Scientists opine that exposure disrupts the hive, interferes with navigation, weakens the immune system and contributes to colony collapse. A researcher wishes to confirm some of these studies and is asking for bee keepers to help by testing their hives. I hope you’ll consider sharing with beekeepers you might know.

“Is electromagnetism one of the causes of the CCD”


2)    In the US telecom Verizon is pressuring the FCC (the equivalent of Industry Canada,) to remove restrictions that now apply to cell towers and transmitters, making it easier for them to use our the taxpayers’ right of way, removing all regulations to enable them to put poles and micro/small cells every 200 meters in preparation for 5G. Please get word out to your city councils, and to all of your contacts, telling them that Telus is doing this already without any notification or regard for our health and property rights. The FDA (equivalent to Health Canada) has allowed the RF exposure guidelines to remain virtually untouched for decades and is one of the worst, if not the worst, in the world. The US’s guidelines are the same as Canada’s SC 6 was before the 2015 revisions, and allow hundreds of times more RF than many other countries, even China, Russia and India.

““According to the carrier, part of the problem is that existing local ordinances are aimed at the much larger and intrusive cell tower facilities of old rather than new small cell technology and are thus more stringent than then currently need to be. Additionally, Verizon alleged some municipalities and their consultants are more than aware of the network infrastructure changes coming down the pipe and are trying to position the rules to gain new revenue streams for local government.

“Without relief, many small cell deployments will face long delays and excessive costs, hindering both wireless broadband deployment and U.S. leadership in the race to 5G,” Verizon wrote.

The battle comes ahead of the move to next-generation 5G networks, which Verizon noted will require an estimated 10 to 100 times more antenna locations than current 3G and 4G networks. Small cell densification efforts have already begun, but carriers (perhaps most notably Sprint) have been tangled up in municipal delays that are slowing the rollouts.”


3)    And here is more small cell/5G propaganda. Notice the industry says that 5G will save lives and as well as health care $$$, as well as creating millions of jobs. Really?   Unbelievable propaganda. No indepth research has been done on the biological effects of prolonged (constant) exposure to milliwave frequencies. No one knows how dangerous 5G will be.

“Building a 5G Infrastructure”  a horror story.



“Carry iPhone at least 5 millimeters away from your body to ensure exposure levels remain at or below the astested levels.”  iPhone manual

Update 2017-03-31 Again Health Canada says RF radiation is safe. Posted April 1/17

1)    An extremely interesting article that shows, from historical perspective,  that evidence showing the harmful effects of RF and EMF  has been available for decades, and how it has been stifled by both governments and industry.  I highly recommend that everyone read this.

Hazards of EMFs and RF Microwave Radiation

2)    Below in letters is a stream of emails back and forth between a member and Tim Singer from Health Canada. In his first email (the last one down) he admits there are studies that show harm, yet he says RF is safe. Would something that is truly safe ever be shown to be dangerous?  Shouldn’t the fact that there are studies, any studies, that show harm below SC 6 levels, be reason for concern, to employ the precautionary principle?  How many would it take? Give us a number, Mr. Singer, and we’ll provide them.  These are in the minority only because health Canada cherry picks the studies they review, reviewing more industry-funded studies than independent ones. We tried to get them to review hundreds at the last panel review, and they refused.  We must continue to pressure Min. Philpott as well as the WHO. Without WHO’s bias and industry support, Health Canada would not be able to hide behind this agency.

3)    Non-RF but re. PRIVACY INVASION.  As you may know the US administration has revoked a bill that protected internet privacy. This will make browsing history, along with buying history, banking history, etc. available to anyone willing to pay.  Since most of us do a lot of searching and reading of US sites we are vulnerable. I am not aware of any means for Canadians to be exempted from this loss of privacy.

Snoops may soon be able to buy your browsing history. Thank the US Congress”


4)    Just recently a group of well-respected researchers met with members of the team at WHO who will be responsible for reviewing current scientific studies to determine if guidelines are adequate. Many concerns have been raised about the objectivity of WHO and ICNIRP panels, many member being closely associated with industry This meeting was intended to pressure the panel to review the evidence that is overwhelming and to call for a re-classification of RF/EMR and to recognize EHS and MCS.

European Cancer and Environmental Research Institute


5)    Another, bizarre industry that is worried about small/microcells and 5G is involved with negotiating sites for transmitters and cell towers. Suddenly these companies are concerned about “the property rights of the individual homeowner”. How bizarre is this?

Yes, Businesses want 5G technology, but not this way.

“But this bill sets the fee for placement in the public right of way at a paltry $15 annually. Who can compete with that? And why should the private sector have to? Are legislators so eager to offer this extraordinary corporate handout to the telecoms that they will destroy the existing free market system?

But there’s an even more disturbing part of this proposed legislation. If passed as written, the Legislature would have the distinction of actually regulating a whole industry out of business. How’s that for Republican values? In today’s free market, firms work with local governments on mapping and planning to choose the best locations and aesthetics and then sell that research to the telecoms. Others reserve space on top of buildings and then rent it to the telecom industry for their equipment. Those firms would literally be regulated out of business.”


6)    A gallery of people who are suffering with EHS.  All ages, both sexes.  This is real and becoming more common. People and their doctors just don’t know about it.



From: Singer, Tim (HC/SC)

To: Marcus  (name given with permission)

Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 6:03 AM

Subject: RE: Cherry picking electro magnetic research by Health Canada

Dear Mr. Schluschen,

Thank you for your further correspondence of January 24, 2017.  I understand that you do not agree with the methodology used by Health Canada in assessing science-based evidence when setting the limits in Safety Code 6 for radiofrequency exposure.

Health Canada monitors the scientific research on the biological effects of radiofrequency (RF) energy on an ongoing basis, considering all peer-reviewed scientific studies and employing a weight-of-evidence approach. As stated in our previous correspondence, the weight-of-evidence approach takes into account both the quantity of studies on a particular endpoint (whether adverse or no effect), and more importantly, the quality of those studies. Poorly conducted studies (e.g., an inadequate exposure evaluation, a lack of appropriate control samples or an inadequate statistical analysis) receive relatively little weight, while properly conducted studies (e.g., with all controls included, appropriate statistics and a complete exposure evaluation) receive more weight.

As with most scientific conclusions, it is possible to find differing scientific opinions. There are scientific studies that have reported biological effects of RF fields that are below the limits in Safety Code 6. These studies are in the minority, are very far from conclusive, and do not represent the prevailing line of scientific evidence in this area.  Health Canada continues to monitor the scientific research in this area. If new scientific evidence were to demonstrate that exposure to RF energy below levels found in Safety Code 6 from wireless technologies is a concern, Health Canada would take appropriate action to help protect the health and safety of Canadians.

Based on the latest scientific evidence, the Department has determined that exposure to RF energy, including that from Wi-Fi technology, below the levels in Safety Code 6, is not dangerous to the public.

Tim Singer

Director General, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate

Health Canada / Government of Canada

tim.singer@canada.ca /

Directeur général, Direction des sciences de la santé environnementale et de la radioprotection

Santé Canada / Gouvernement du Canada

tim.singer@canada.ca /

From:  Marcus]
Sent: 2017-01-24 7:04 PM
To: Singer, Tim (HC/SC)
Subject: Cherry picking electro magnetic research by Health Canada

Dear Mr. Singer,

As expected, your response is industry friendly, while public health receives little attention.

It is obvious that Canadian officials like you, as well as your American counterparts, are instructed to direct responsibility away from the billion dollar wireless industry.

Dr. Thomas Rau, Medical Director of the world renowned Paracelsus Clinic in Lustmuehle, Switzerland, is convinced that  ‘electromagentic loads’ from modern technology, lead to cancer, concentration problems, ADD, tinnitus, migraines, insomnia, arrhythmia, Parkinson’s and many other ailments.

At Paracelsus (www.paracelsus.ch), cancer patients are routinely educated in electromagnetic field remediation strategies and inspectors from the Geopathological Institute of Switzerland are sent to patients homes, to assess electromagnetic radiation exposures.

Annually, The Paracelsus Clinic treats thousands of people suffering from electro hypersensitivity (EHS), aka. microwave syndrome.  Many of their EHS patients are from North America.

Dr. William Rea, MD founder of the Environmental Health Centre, Dallas – and former president of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine.

“Sensitivity to electromagnetic radiation is the emerging health problem of the 21st century.  It is imperative health practitioners, governments, schools and parents learn more about it.  The human health stakes are significant!”

Guideline of the Austrian Medical Association – for the diagnosis and treatment of EMF related health problems and illnesses (EMF syndrome)

Consensus paper of the Austrian Medical Association’s EMF Working Group ( AG-EMF)


“There has been a sharp rise in unspecific, often stress-associated health problems that increasingly present physicians with the challenge of complex differential diagnosis. A cause that has been accorded little attention so far is increasing electro-smog exposure at home, at work and during leisure activities, occurring in addition to chronic stress in personal and working life. It correlates with an overall situation of chronic stress that can lead to burnout.

How can physicians respond to this development? The Austrian Medical Association has developed a guideline for differential diagnosis and potential treatment of unspecific stress-related health problems associated with electro-smog. Its core element is a patient questionnaire consisting of a general assessment of stress symptoms and a specific assessment of electro-smog exposure. The guideline is intended as an aid in diagnosing and treating EMF-related health problems.”

If Health Canada truly values the health of Canadians, you would contact Dr. Thomas Rau (speaks English fluently) of the Paracelsus Clinic, Dr. William Rea of the Environmental Health Centre, as well as The Austrian Medical Association.

Not contacting any of these experts, who have gained extensive knowledge in this field, would affirm Health Canada’s unhealthy, profit driven relationship with the telecom industry.

Only people of low intelligence are convinced that they have all the answers, and blindly dismiss the research of world renown scientist and doctors of other countries.

If man of science would have chosen to remain ignorant in the past, Earth would have remained flat.

Kind regards,

Marcus Schluschen

524 Mallard Way,

Gold River, BC

—– Original Message —–

From: Singer, Tim (HC/SC)

To: Marcus

Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 11:49 AM

Subject: Re: Electromagnetic Radiation

Dear Mr. Schluschen,

This is further to your correspondence of October 16, 2016, addressed to the Honourable Jane Philpott, Minister of Health, concerning electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation and the health of Canadians.  I am truly sorry to hear about the health conditions that your wife is experiencing and I hope she is receiving appropriate medical care. I also apologize for the delay in responding.

Health Canada’s mandate regarding human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic energy from wireless devices includes conducting studies on possible health effects, monitoring the scientific literature related to such effects on an ongoing basis, and developing RF exposure guidelines, commonly referred to as Safety Code 6. The responsibility for the regulation of communications equipment such as cell towers and wireless technologies lies with Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED). ISED has developed regulatory standards that require compliance with the human exposure limits outlined in Safety Code 6.

Health Canada’s 2015 revision of Safety Code 6 followed a thorough evaluation of scientific evidence and literature on the effects of radiofrequency energy on biological systems. In the establishment of acceptable limits, departmental scientists considered all peer-reviewed scientific studies, and employed a weight-of-evidence approach when evaluating possible health risks from exposure to RF energy. Poorly conducted studies receive relatively little weight, while properly conducted studies receive more weight. On the basis of such analyses, Health Canada established limits for human exposure that are well below the threshold for any potential harm. The limits recommended for general public exposure were designed to provide protection to all age groups, including children, if exposed on a continual basis.

During the 2015 update to Safety Code 6, Health Canada considered all studies that were both in the scope and of sufficient quality for inclusion in its risk assessment. While it is true that some of these studies report biological effects of RF fields at levels below the limits in Safety Code 6, I want to emphasize that such studies are in the minority and do not represent the prevailing line of scientific evidence. If new scientific evidence were to demonstrate that exposure to RF energy below levels found in Safety Code 6 from wireless technologies is a concern, the department would take appropriate action to help protect the health and safety of Canadians.

With respect to your comments regarding Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM), please note that Health Canada does not use a SAM when developing the human exposure limits in Safety Code 6.

Health Canada recognizes that some individuals have reported health symptoms that they believe are due to exposure to RF-emitting devices. While the symptoms are real, the scientific evidence provides strong support that these health effects are not associated with RF exposure. Health Canada, other leading health agencies, and the World Health Organization, have concluded that, to date, there is no convincing scientific evidence linking adverse symptoms to levels below existing RF exposure limits.

I hope that you will understand the Department’s position on this matter and find that my comments are helpful.

Tim Singer

Director General, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate

Health Canada / Government of Canada

tim.singer@canada.ca /

Directeur général, Direction des sciences de la santé environnementale et de la radioprotection

Santé Canada / Gouvernement du Canada

tim.singer@canada.ca /


“It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.”    Albert Einstein

Update 2017-03-28 Videos about going off the grid. Posted Mar 30/17

1)    Here is a link to several short videos made by a couple who have gone off the grid.  It will be posted along with others on our website at http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/more/how-to-go-off-the-grid/


2)    IoT management of the “smart” grid is a disturbing thought. This means all control and maintenance will be via a hackable internet. This seems to make a vulnerable system even more vulnerable.

Oracle Cloud Plugs Into Smart Grid 

IoT device management would include maintenance, configuration changes, firmware upgrades and security monitoring. Compatibility and security have emerged as major headaches, with IoT devices proving vulnerable to hacks by botnets and other malware…


Much of the impetus for a cloud-based grid management service stems from the huge amounts data generated by two-way smart meters and other sensors being installed by utilities. Cloud vendors such as Oracle argue that a key challenge in synching grid operations with IT infrastructure is the ability to handle real-time rather than just transactional data.”




3)    In Pennsylvania it appears that the PUC is trying to force people to take a smeter if they want service, just as the govt. did here. If this technology is so great, why the laws making it mandatory, counter to civil rights?




4)    It is vital to get info about the effects of RF into the discussion. One of our members made a comment about this article which is about sperm problems. It had not mentioned the connection between infertility and RF so Sherry did. In response, a mother spoke about her son having a brain tumor which is likely associated with cell phones. More good info into this comment section.  Please, if you have the opportunity, help educate others about the dangers associated with wireless devices.




A letter from X to Wendy Mesley at CBC after the show that aired on Friday March 24,2017


A good report but could have included a lot more material concerning cellphone towers, micro cells, smartmeters, GPS and frequency in the vehicle, dirty electricity…how since the beginning of having power/electricity caused many diseases that never were around prior to when ‘power’ became available.  How people develop cancer living near power lines…labeling does help to inform cellphone users if and when they find the information on their phone or in the small print of their cellphone manuals, however there is so much evidence & science illustrating how damaging wifi and other frequencies are for all living things not just humans. 


I personally have had EMF sensitivities for over 15 years now.  Trying to escape the wifi and other frequencies is a ‘tall order”.  I would have never thought that I had this problem.  I procrastinated for years not wanting to believe that it was the source of my migraines, numbness in arms, burning and radiating my face (total redness), lack of sleep, nausea, trembling, depression, brain pain, eye socket pain….and more symptoms!  A horrible way to live.  I can’t use a cellphone, dec phone, have trouble cooking at my stove….now I wear protective clothing, This is a condition that will grow in numbers as each day passes. 


The technology is clearly not safe!!  Safety Code 6 is far too lenient and based on thermal ionization & should include non thermal.  I know so many other people who are also struggling with their kids not being able to tolerate the wifi in their schools so now they are home schooled.   And now they want to roll out 5g!!  How do we escape the proliferation of all of these frequencies.  We are born with our own frequency.  That is how our heart beats and so forth…an electrical pulse.  Do we honestly believe that our bodies aren’t affected??  We need unbiased non telecom industry funded studies!  And there are a few but their results are being muzzled.  Just ask Dr. Olle Johansson from Sweden and other incredibly intelligent scientists!!  Thank you for including Frank Clegg and Devra Davis!! 


In my experience & from many others with electromagnetic frequency sensitivities, once you become ill, it’s  a very long process to try to restore your health.  I have not gotten better but I am able to cope with all of things that I have had to do to make my home tolerable and protect myself when I go outside of my home.  This report is a start but quite honestly to me it was so minimal, more like a fluff piece that could have included far more material!!  I absolutely do appreciate the report however, you should follow up by expanding the scope of material on this very important and timely subject matter.  I just hope that the Telecom Industry does not influence your reporting, as they often have with others!!!  This type of technology, as convenient and amazing that it seems to be, is not worth the danger that it presents towards all living things!  We need clean & unharmful technology!  This is no different when doctors were saying that cigarettes were good for digestion and for the lungs…it took 40 to 50 years before the truth  was revealed even after millions of people died of lung disease!  How long will it take this time before the truth is realized and shared with the public!!  Same thing with lead, asbestos, bisphenol A, etc. 

Thank you Wendy for your efforts!! 

Stay strong,




“If we remain silent, we kill freedom, justice and the possibility that a society armed with information may have power to change the situation that has brought us to this point.” – Anabel Hernández


Smart Meter Alert – Global Data Firm: “We Help Utilities Surveil and Profile Their Customers, and Monetize Home Surveillance Data” posted Mar 26/17
Importance : Haute



Global Data Firm: “ We Help Utilities Surveil and Profile Their Customers, and Monetize Home Surveillance Data”


Watch Onzo’s brash admission of spying, profiling, and monetizing you.


This is irrefutable evidence that ‘smart’ meters are intended to facilitate for-profit surveillance.


A real « SPYCONOMY » at its best !


“ We use this characterized profile to give the utility… the ability to monetize their customer data by providing a direct link to appropriate third-party organizations based on the customer’s identified character.”


Suddenly, in one fell swoop, ALL the utility’s myths on privacy are now clearly unveiled.


Watch this: https://takebackyourpower.net/onzo-admits-smart-meter-spying-for-profit/


Onzo's business model is spying for profit.


Make no mistake, don’t believe the LIES of Hydro-Québec and the Gouvernment’s CROOKS that will pop-up in accomplice mass media to reassure you by saying:



«But we poison them with our carcinogenic electromagnetic radiation! We set fire to their houses! We grab evidences by sending our employees to retrieve the burned smart meters at crime scenes and by refusing to have them appraised by the municipal fire departments. After that we tell them: Get by with your problems! »






Regardez l’impressionnante reconnaissance d’espionnage, de profilage et de monétisation d’Onzo.


“Nous aidons les services publics à surveiller, à profiler leurs clients et à monétiser leurs données privées à domicile.”


C’est une preuve irréfutable que les compteurs intelligents sont destinés à faciliter la surveillance à but lucratif.


“Nous utilisons ce profil caractérisé pour donner à l’utilité … la capacité de monétiser leurs données client en fournissant un lien direct vers des organisations tierces appropriées en fonction du caractère identifié du client.”


Une véritable «ESPIONOCONOMIE» à son meilleur.


D’un seul coup, tous les mythes des compagnies d’électricité sur la vie privée sont maintenant clairement dévoilés.


Et n’allez surtout pas croire les portes-mensonges et les bandits d’Hydro-Québec et du Gouverne-et-Ment qui s’empareront des médias complices pour vous rassurer en vous disant :  




«Mais on les empoisonnent avec nos radiations électromagnétique cancérigènes! On met le feu à leurs maisons! On fait disparaître les preuves à conviction en envoyant nos employés sur les scènes de crime pour récupérer les compteurs brûlés et en refusant de les faire expertiser par les services d’incendie municipaux. Après, on leur dit: débrouillez-vous avec vos problèmes!



Contacts privés – Pour assurer votre confidentialité, votre adresse est mise en copie conforme invisible (Cci). Si vous ne souhaitez plus recevoir de courriels, m’en aviser à indigo_sun@videotron.ca. Si vous faites suivre ce message, utiliser (Cci) lorsque transféré à plusieurs personnes à la fois.


Private e-mail list – To ensure your privacy, your e-mail address is up blind carbon copy (Bcc). If you no longer wish to receive e-mails, write to indigo_sun@videotron.ca. If you forward this message, use (BCC) when transferred to several people at once.


«Une foi stupide en position d’autorité est le pire ennemi de la vérité!» — Albert Einstein


« Une foi stupide obéissant aux autorités est le premier ennemi de la vérité! » — IS


« D’abord, si je connais les lois de l’univers, je ne connais presque rien aux êtres humains. De plus, il semble qu’un président d’Israël doit parfois signer des choses qu’il désapprou-ve, et personne «ne peut imaginer» que je puisse faire cela. » — Albert Einstein (1879–1955), Prix Nobel de physique 1921, Médaille Copley 1925, Médaille Max-Planck 1929. Grand plagiaire de la théorie erronée de la relativité (E=MC²) volée au mathématicien français, Jules-Henri Poincaré, [Comme Elie Weisel] Albert Einstein est un emblème de la juiverie internationale – riant de son escroquerie à la face du monde – mis en place par les mondia-listes pour faire croire au monde que les Juifs, le Peuple Élu de Dieu, sont infiniment plus intelligents et valeureux que les non-Juifs, donc génétiquement supérieurs aux goyim (non-juifs).


« La gloire est le seul héritage du véritable génie, […] ; il ne faut pas la lui laisser dérober par des plagiaires ». — Alphonse de Lamartine (1790–1869)


« Ce n’est pas ce que vous ignorez qui vous attire des ennuis, c’est ce dont vous êtes certain alors que ce n’est pas vrai! » — Mark Twain (1835–1910)


« Les sujets les plus difficiles peuvent être expliqués à l’esprit le plus lent s’il n’en a pas déjà formé une idée; mais la chose la plus simple ne peut être expliquée à l’homme le plus intelligent s’il est fermement persuadé qu’il sait déjà, sans l’ombre d’un doute, ce qui se trouve devant lui ».  — Lev Nikolaïevitch [Léon] Tolstoï (1828–1910) 


« Ce refus de voir, malgré des dossiers de preuves apportés, et provenant de différentes sources, est très dangereux puisque non seulement ce genre d’attitude est comme un feu vert donné pour l’établissement de dictatures et de tyrannies sur le dos des popu-lations qui en souffriront, mais encore, cette manière de penser rend les individus concernés directement responsables de l’exis-tence de telles situations. » — Serge Monast (1945–1996), journaliste d’enquête à l’Agence Internationale Américaine de Presse Libre.


« Lorsqu’une vérité allant à l’encontre du discours dominant et du consensus social est émise, elle est d’abord ridiculisée, puis férocement combattu, puis ignorée, pour finale-ment devenir acceptée comme étant la norme. »


« Si vous n’êtes pas vigilants, les médias arriveront à vous faire détester les gens opprimés et aimer ceux qui les oppriment. » — Malcom X (1925–1965)


« À une époque de supercherie universelle, dire la vérité est un acte révolutionnaire. » — George Orwell (1903–1950)


 « Qui croit sans savoir est un sot, mais qui nie sans savoir est un fou! » — Vercors (1902–1991)


« ” La justice? Quelle justice? ” Au plus fort la poche! La violence engendre la violence, c’est bien connu. La misère crée le pil-lage; la richesse aussi. La richesse est souvent le résultat net d’une absence de morale – la loi du plus fort. Cette autre forme de pillage, cette fois organisée, la rend plus respectueuse aux yeux du plus grand nombre, comme le crime organisé. La misère et la richesse sont dans leurs excès des formes de violence. L’injustice aussi. Quand on voit ses droits continuellement bafoués, mépri-sés, sans espoir de redressement, la tentation de recourir à la violence comme tribunal de dernier ressort, en désespoir de cause, devient irrésistible et cette révolte est parfois légitime lorsqu’elle est absolument nécessaire et qu’il n’y a pas d’autre issue. Il n’y a qu’une solution à la violence des baricades et des casseurs, c’est l’ordre – bien sûr! – mais dans la justice. » — L’honorable juge Marc Brière (Citation: http://bit.ly/16nkDhc) (Livre 157 pages: http://bit.ly/2b543dR)


Cette publication est en conformité avec le jugement 2002 CSC 14.27704 de la Cour Suprême du Canada qui en date du 21 février 2002, stipule que les citoyens ont le droit d’exprimer leur opinion sur Internet; la liberté d’expression étant un droit acquis et enchâssé dans la Charte canadienne des droits de 1982. Jugement complet: http://bit.ly/1wTnhAW 


CANADA et QUÉBEC étant des entreprises et/ou deux corporations privées de services gou-vernementaux dument enregistrées à la commission américaine de régulation des marchés financiers (U. S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION), toutes actions découlant des activités politiques, juridiques, économiques, commerciales et environnementale des dites entreprises ayant des répercussions directes et indirectes sur la vie réelle des hommes et des femmes composés de chair de sang et d’Âme/Esprit ainsi que sur la vie légale/fictive de leurs personnalités juridiques (Code civil Art. 1) (des citoyens, contribuables, électeurs et con-sommateurs) canadiens, doivent nécessairement tomber sous le coup de ce jugement.




Personnages célèbres

MULRONEY BRIAN :  http://bit.ly/1yNPs9n

(Ancien premier ministre du Canada ayant vendu son Âme et son pays au libre marché américano-sioniste.)

ROCKEFELLER DAVID : http://bit.ly/1HdAdws

(Grand bankster mondial et meurtrier de masse, notamment les millions de civils Irakiens, suite à son échec avec Sadam Hussein ayant refusé de normaliser le fonctionnement des institutions bancaires irakiennes avec celles du cartel Rothschild/Rockefeller américano-sioniste.)


Gouvernement du Canada

CANADA : http://1.usa.gov/14FESWC

CANADA MORTGAGE & HOUSING CORP : http://bit.ly/2btQrr0

(Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation/Société canadienne d’hypothèques et de logement)

Gouvernements – Provinces canadiennes

QUÉBEC : http://1.usa.gov/1wTn5lk 

ONTARIO : http://bit.ly/2b6hkwV

BRITHISH COLUMBIA : http://bit.ly/2b7gjb3

SASKATCHEWAN : http://bit.ly/2btTD5G

Gouvernements – Villes canadiennes

OLD MONTREAL : http://bit.ly/2bDvfMH

VICTORIAVILLE : http://bit.ly/2b4TJ5V

St-Jérôme : http://bit.ly/2bshzb9

Lac St Jean : http://bit.ly/2btOxGC

NUNS ISLAND : http://bit.ly/2bE0l7G

Ste-Catherine : http://bit.ly/2b6dF2a

SAN MIGUEL : http://bit.ly/2b6dQKX

EDMONTON : http://bit.ly/2b7cnat

Autres compagnies

Montreal Exchange : http://bit.ly/2bsnJbb


HYDRO QUÉBEC : http://bit.ly/2bsmE31

HYDRO QUÉBEC INTERNATIONAL : http://bit.ly/2b4crct

MONTREAL GAZETTE GROUP : http://bit.ly/2bauqLx

YUKON GOLD CORP : http://bit.ly/2batIhx

Update 2017-03-22 Is Hydro manipulating smeters & Lawsuits? posted Mar 24/17

1)    The mayors and legal counsels for Cleveland and other cities in Ohio explain why they are challenging a recent law that allows telecom companies to put small/microcells anywhere they want, usurping the cities’ authorities. At about the 22 min. point there is discussion about the interference that is caused by people living near these transmitters – people could experience worse service rather than better.

“City of Cleveland Announces Lawsuit Opposing Ohio Senate Bill 331”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWE8EC-bqEI  36 min

2)    Below is an email written by economist Erik Andersen introducing the article written by Rafe Mair calling for an investigation into the mismanagement (willful or otherwise) of BC Hydro which has resulted in rampant increases in Hydro’s debt. 

“Ms. Anton, if you don’t order a full enquiry forthwith on the evidence before you, in light of the statutory requirement of the Attorney General Act and your sworn oath to “see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with law”, it would be open to fair conjecture that this inaction is to protect your political colleagues.”


3)    Is Hydro manipulating smeters?  Someone in Nanaimo believes his has.

I don’t know whether to call this a rant or rave. After MONTHS of tracking my electricity usage down to the watt (spreadsheet after spreadsheet of what appliances/devices in my home were used for how many minutes per day or week, the # of watts each device uses per hour etc etc), I basically proved mathematically that there is NO WAY my meter was recording accurate usage. So I contacted BC Hydro today to request that my meter be pulled and tested for accuracy. After speaking to a supervisor for over an hour (who did everything in his power to try to talk me out of having the meter tested, by the way), I insisted that he wasn’t going to change my mind and I was willing to pay the $92 to have it done by Measurement Canada. One thing that did come up during our conversation was that there were unusual “spikes” in my usage from one hour to the next. So here’s the rant/rave part – after I finally got him to understand that he wasn’t going to get me to change my mind and he agreed to send me out the application form for Measurement Canada, I started checking my meter reading every hour on the hour, trying to locate one of these “spikes”. And guess what??? My electricity consumption has dropped by 75 – 80% in the last 12 hours. NOTHING in my home/habits/usage has changed since I spoke with BC Hydro this morning. I’ve got months and months of data from their own website showing that on average my meter was recording 4KW every single hour (and sometimes much more due to those “spikes” previously mentioned). My 18 month daily average has been consistent at around 80 – 100 KW/day in the winter (although some days much higher), and 30 – 50 KW/day in the summer. Since my call to BC Hydro this morning my meter is now recording usage of approximately 1KW per hour, for a grand total of 12 KW in the last 11 hours, or the equivalent of roughly 24 KW/day. EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF CONSISTENT, DAILY USAGE HISTORY with NO unexplained “reductions in consumption” and it’s now “magically” dropped to a level that is consistent with all my hours and hours of tracking my habits/appliances, watts/usage etc. I swear to god I’m not making this up – The ONLY thing that has changed in the last 12 hours is that BC Hydro is now aware that I am going to apply to Measurement Canada to get my meter tested. Now I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist, but I really have to wonder how this is even physically possible. The amount and timing of this “sudden” drop in usage is just so incredibly suspicious I am literally gobsmacked. If anyone can think of a reasonable explanation I would love to hear it….
Just for everyone’s info

My response:

I have been told by an electrical engineer that when the meter, being a computer,  is pulled from the socket it reboots itself thus removing historical data that could be used to track a meter’s errors.  Also, when being tested in a pristine laboratory, the conditions are entirely different than in the “real world” where there could be external sources that interfere. Also, testing is highly controlled as are the results. That is how Hydro can say that they’ve checked many smart meters and they have never found one that runs fast. The engineer also said accurate testing would take approximately 14 hours, not the few min. normally done by Hydro. 

Make the testing be done at your home without removing the meter. This is possible and is the only way that Meas. Can. or Hydro can tell you if your meter is accurate or not.

The manipulation hinted at is possible since the software and the meter itself can be controlled/changed remotely. As well as shown in tests of meters elsewhere, these meters can and do run fast whether due to mis-programming, interference, or error. Without doing what this person has done, monitoring and measuring, calculating what each appliance uses per hour, etc. or having a reliable analog running alongside, it is hard to tell if these meters are accurate or not. I have been told by an insider that people at Hydro know these meters run fast, but “only by a little”, perhaps $1-2 a month. Not enough for anyone to notice but multiply by 1.8 million meters this amounts to more than $20 million of ill-gotten gains per year.

4)    CBS news in the US broadcast about dangers of cell phones, spoke about the National Toxicology Project. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbTcXZhdaXw  3:38 min.

5)    Efforts to expand 5G technology are increasing. Because millimeter waves are weak, they have trouble penetrating obstructions and even foliage can cause problems. I suggest we all plant lots of trees and tall plants around our homes.

mmWave 5G, by the way, will nominally use frequencies between 30GHz and 300Ghz (28GHz? Close enough apparently!) for wireless broadband communications and more. The advantage of using such high frequencies — 2.5GHz is the loftiest band used for cellular in the US at the moment — is that there is a lot of mmWave bandwidth available for new 5G services. It is also much easier to develop massive antenna arrays at a reasonable size with higher frequencies. (See Sprint Gets Ready for Massive MIMO, Eyes 2.5GHz for 5G.)

There are trade-offs, however, because the signal penetration and range at 28GHz or higher gets shorter and more subject to line-of-sight and foliage concerns. (See 60GHz: A Frequency to Watch for more.)



From: ERIK ANDERSEN   (name given with permission).
Sent: March 21, 2017 5:45 PM
Subject: Fwd: BC Hydro’s real debt has grown 1337% under Liberals…Shouldn’t someone call the cops? -The Common Sense Canadian

Rafe has written an explosive but accurate description of what has been happening to the  public finances/financial obligations now burdening every citizen in BC.

About 10 years ago I and others started looking at the financial trends of BC Hydro. Several of us presented our concerns to provincial politicians , BC Hydro and the BCUC   but our concerns fell into dead space. First there was the deliberate turning BC Rail into a financial mess designed to make its privatization more publicly palpable. If that alone was not bad enough the then government actively engaged in bid rigging. When the matter finally did come to court and certain prominent BC politicians faced the prospect of being forced to be cross examined, they designed an escape by having two conveniently available mid-rank  civil servants volunteer to fall on their swords, after providing the government settled their respective legal costs and allowed them to escape of other legal penalties.  Because the courts stood by and let this happen, even though they must have had a guilty plea from the two designated “criminals”, nobody was then ever held accountable for what was an illegal action. Not the finest day for the BC legal establishment.

We have now entered the end game as described by John Perkins and that is where the financial noose is about to close so that  those waiting in the wings can buy up public assets at bargain prices. It will not just be about assets like dams, bridges, airports, sea ports, highways, sewer systems, water works but also about the natural monopolies we presently enjoy. Natural monopolies exist such as the customers of BC Hydro, the customers of ICBC and so on.  The transfer of such monopolies into private hands will absolutely result in increased costs to the public simply because that is what private monopolies do. You might be tempted to think that the BCUC will protect you from any excesses, but surely after seeing the commission excluded from any role in the determination of the need for Site C  and other examples that could be cited, you should check your back more carefully because the BCUC does not have it, entirely because the government does not want it that way.

I continue to standby my words of several years ago. The board and management at BC Hydro have been either economic and financial illiterates or dutifully following the orders of those not having the public’s best interests in mind.

It is hoped that this type of information will help guide your voting next month.


“The Baby unit shall be installed and used such that parts of the user’s body other than the hands are maintained at a distance of approximately 20 centimeters (8 inches) or more.”   Baby Monitor Motorola MBP33 manual

Stop Buying!  Stop Using!!  Demand safe alternatives.

Update 2017-03-19 Participants wanted for online study re. EHS USA SMART METER CLASSACTIONS! posted Mar 21/17

1)    Below are the legal documents submitted in the Florida class action re. smeters. I think if you read the certification document, at least up to and including pg. 14, you will see striking similarities with what was done in BC. Also, the contempt for the safety of the homeowners is obvious. 

“Based on the results of the study, FPL currently expects that it will identify approximately 1,800 – 2,200 customer-owned meter enclosures annually through the use of the predictive tool, with 78 percent (+/- 5 percent) of the enclosures identified having some level of damage or deterioration of components requiring repair in order for the enclosure to be in proper operating condition.” Thus, FPL itself anticipates that approximately 1400 – 1700 consumers per year will require repairs to their meter cans as a result of the Smart Meter installation. Further, implicit in FPL’s findings from its study is that those consumers who will require repairs will not be identified for years. “   pg. 14 of the certification document.




2)    Looking for participants for an online study re. EHS. 

From: gibsonpr@jmu.edu
Sent: 3/16/2017 12:46:03 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time


The James Madison University Environmental Sensitivities Research Team is inviting adults aged 21 and over who have experienced environmental sensitivities (chemical and/or electrical) to participate in on online study of how their needs are being met as they grow older with sensitivities. If you are interested in participating, please click on the link below to see the consent form and learn more about the study. If you are unable to complete the survey online, you are welcome to request a hard copy that can be mailed to you. To request a hard copy please email gibsonpr@jmu.edu or call 540-568-6195 and leave a message with you name (clearly stated) and your complete address. Thank you ahead to everyone who helps me with this study. To take the survey online, copy this url into your browser:http://jmu.co1.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_4YGd1uBrKkxx8nr

Pamela Gibson, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology
James Madison University, MSC 7704
Harrisonburg, VA 22807

3)    Is Health Minister Jane Philpot being deceived and misled by Health Canada? Many of us have written to her believing, that as a doctor in a cabinet where science was going to be paramount, she would force Health Canada to do its job, to consider all the scientific evidence showing Safety Code 6 is inadequate/outdated. But in response we’ve received the same old form letters saying that all if fine, there is no evidence of harm if exposures are under SC 6.  Andre Fauteux, from Quebec, is tackling this issue. The English article is below in Letters.



4)    Update on the US Navy’s plans for electro-magnetic wargames over the Olympic Peninsula. It’s disappointing that after sending information to politicians at all levels of government that we haven’t heard from a single one willing to speak out about the effects such wargames will have on BC. If you haven’t signed the petition, I hope you will considering doing so.  



5)    A few years ago new technology was introduced in a pilot project in St. Cloud, Minn. when “Li-fi” was installed in public buildings. Li-fi uses light via fiber optic cable to deliver data. Scientists, like Olle Johannson have warned that this new technology needs to be studied to make sure it’s safe before putting it out there for the public. So far I haven’t seen any studies that have been done but this sounds very promising.

Wi-Fi on rays of light: 100 times faster, and never overloaded

Research team gets a speed of 42.8 Gbit/s with a ray of light in an optical wireless network



Jim Cooperman’s letter re. Hydro mismanagement got published: http://www.kamloopsthisweek.com/bc-hydro-mismanagement-top-election-issue/

From India to Massachusetts, which is studying five bills in this area and in Maryland, which is considering replacing Wi-Fi with wired connections in its schools, public health authorities are seeking to reduce the increasing exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RF) in the microwave band emitted by antennas and wireless communication devices. Maryland et al. Want to take action following the release last year of the preliminary results of a US $ 25 million study funded by the US government . These results clearly demonstrated that cellular RFs can cause two types of cancer in rats – one of which is the brain – that is more likely than normal to use cell phones regularly for more than 10 years, As confirmed by two recent meta-analyzes . Last year, an American study concluded that malignant brain tumors (which have reduced leukemia to the forefront of childhood cancer) are the leading cause of cancer death in adolescents and young adults. In addition, millions of people overexposed to electromagnetic fields (EMF) say they suffer from electromagnetic hypersensitivity ( HSEM ), which also affects animals and plants.

It is in this context that the hope aroused in several, by the appointment of physician Jane Philpott as Canadian Minister of Health, has just deflated. Last October, she opposed a plea of inadmissibility in response to recommendations made by the Standing Committee on Health of the House of Commons, in its report ” Electromagnetic radiation of radio frequencies and the health of Canadians .” Among its twelve recommendations were: updating the diagnosis and treatment of HSEM, as recently done by the European Academy of Environmental Medicine ; And the adoption, as in the case of France which has legislated and Cyprus , Israel and the Italian Tyrol, which have issued directives to limit exposure to RF to vulnerable groups, including babies and Young children in school.

Minister Philpott’s response contradicted the testimony of the independent experts cited by the Standing Committee. In particular, she stated: “Safety Code 6 [CS6, the national guideline limiting exposure to RF] gives very high margins of safety against all adverse health effects associated with exposure to RF fields Been established “; And quoting the World Health Organization (WHO) , she adds that “although the symptoms some people attribute to electromagnetic hypersensitivity are real, the scientific evidence strongly corroborates that these health effects are not related to Exposure to EMF “.

The Minister’s response raised an outcry for protests, including from Frank Clegg, former president of Microsoft Canada and founder of the Canadian Society for Safe Technology (C4ST). Supported by Dr. Anthony B. Miller, Honorary Professor of Public Health at the University of Toronto and former Director of Epidemiology at the National Cancer Institute, Mr. Clegg accused the Minister of misleading Canadians A statement issued last October . He explained to us by e-mail: “Unfortunately, it appears that the minister did not directly investigate the issue, but accepted Health Canada’s response at face value. We continue to believe that Health Canada does not support the direction of the Liberal government to base its policies on evidence. The response contained the same non-transparent, incomplete and outdated responses that we have heard over the years. Health Canada continues to reject the scientific data, published and based on evidence, which show damage to the health-below the exposure levels of the Safety Code 6. “Also called EHS (EHS) and Syndrome Intolerance to electromagnetic fields or SICEM ), HSEM is characterized by several symptoms (neurological, cutaneous, auditory, cardiac, etc.) observed since the 1950s in the Soviet military overexposed to non-thermal doses of RF, In people overexposed to antenna and wireless transmissions .

Lies and Conflict of Interest

Health Canada officials reportedly lied to Mrs. Philpott, said Jerry Flynn in a letter to the minister. Mr. Flynn is a retired captain of the Canadian Armed Forces, where for 22 years he was an expert in electronic warfare and communications intelligence. According to him, “since the 1930s, more than 6,000 studies have been accumulated, producing an irrefutable conclusion that exposure to microwaves and [domestic] electromagnetic fields is considerably detrimental to all life and human health. (…) In 1966, all western countries adopted dangerously high – but “safe” – limits to EMF radiation exposure, limits [such as CS6] that only protect against radiation [RF] Powerful to reach the thermal threshold! The truth has been deliberately suppressed by Western countries in favor of military interests and the unprecedented benefits enjoyed by the enterprises and governments of these countries! (…) Such contempt for the health, welfare and safety of the public requires an exhaustive international criminal investigation at the highest possible level, as it is truly an odious crime against humanity! Health Canada categorically denies these accusations ( see the department’s response and Mr. Flynn’s comments ).

Health Canada’s approach was established by physicist and biologist Michael Repacholi, who led his program on non-ionizing radiation from 1975 to 1982. From 1995 to 2005, he founded and coordinated the International Project for Non- study the EMC to wHO, in 2005, was funded 40% by the mobile phone industry , according to journalist David Leloup of Agoravox . However, it was in conjunction with eight electricity companies and by discarding the studies that disturbed them that he drafted the WHO recommendations on exposure to domestic magnetic fields, according to Microwave News . Moreover, since 1990, Repacholi is well known as consultant and expert witness for the electricity and telecommunications companies. In fact, the WHO guidelines and most countries on EMF are based on the recommendations of the International Commission against non-ionizing radiation (ICNIRP), organization that Repacholi founded in 1992 and which the Are scientists funded by, or sympathetic to, the industry. In addition, five of the six members of the WHO group who are required to update their RF exposure guidelines are current or former members of the ICNIRP, denouncing the Swedish oncologist and epidemiologist Lennart Hardell , A pioneer in cancer risk research for people overexposed to RF as well as polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins and pesticides pentachlorophenol (PCP), Agent Orange and glyphosate (Monsanto’s Roundup). Former or current members of ICNIRP are behind the misleading recommendations of the UK government in this regard, denounced neuroscience researcher Sarah J. Starkey in Reviews on Environmental Health in December 2016 . As the text of Mobile Text : Influence on Influence in the WHO states  : “The [WHO] CEM Project was corrupt from the start,” said Andrew Marino , Professor of Cell Biology at the Health Sciences Center of the WHO. University of Louisiana. Michael Repacholi was known for more than six years as a paid consultant and mouthpiece of companies responsible for generating electromagnetic pollution. In 2011, Andrew Marino co-authored one of the few studies (independent of governments and industry – demonstrating that EMF actually triggers electromagnetic hypersensitivity .

“The WHO betrays the citizens of the Earth in the most blatant and destructive way,” says Olga Sheen , a former electrohypersensitive and survivor of brain cancer. Since December 2016, more than 2,000 people have signed a vote of no confidence in the WHO , requesting that the current coordinator of her EMF project, Emilie van Deventer, Michael Repacholi’s protégé and an electrical engineer linked to the ” Industry and without medical experience, is dismissed as WHO is due to publish its update on radio frequencies, the Healthcare Monograph (RF EHC), an authoritative report. In response to WHO’s call for consultations on this draft monograph, many independent scientists and researchers have pointed out its blatant bias and lack of transparency, which they say is a mockery of this consultation process. “The monograph project has omitted many publications on hypersensitivity,” deplored biologist Marg Friesen, a former Canadian government researcher working for C4ST, in December 2014. WHO has not responded to our requests to comment.


“You will observe with concern how long a useful truth may be known, and exist, before it is generally received and acted on.”   Ben Franklin