We are almost to my knew website but want to keep the truth coming so please share with others! Tami Oct 3/17
If you missed watching The Truth about Cancer LIVE last weekend, I have good news. This weekend. you have another chance to catch the whole thing.
This was a powerful event with 40 expert speakers in the fields of natural and alternative health – what I prefer to call ‘reality medicine’. They shared every new therapy and protocol they knew for healing cancer naturally.
I was honored to speak on DAY THREE at 1:30 PM on The Politics of Cancer, and answer the question: “If this is true, why doesn’t my doctor know about it?”
Those who tuned in had to make difficult choices regarding which speakers to watch. There were nine breakout sessions and three stages, all rolling along simultaneously so, no matter how you may have tried, you are sure to have missed something really important.
So Ty and his team are once again going the extra mile to make sure anyone who wants to see this has another chance. Beginning Friday, October 13th, at 8:30 AM Eastern, The Truth About Cancer LIVE 2017 will be replayed in its entirety over three days.
You’ll be able to watch any of the 40 speakers you missed – including me.
Or, you can re-watch your favorite session again and go deeper into the information.
P.S. Be assured it really is free to watch. This information needs to be in as many hands as possible. So, if you know someone who has been affected by cancer – please share this link with them so they can watch also. They will thank you for doing so.
Hey Tami, doctors who save lives naturally! posted Oct 12/17
Many of you know the story of how I was able to overcome and beat cancer using natural methods and treatments.
And many of you also know that without the help of you and many others, this may not have been possible.
So, because I’m so grateful to all of those that helped me on my long, hard and sometimes terrifying journey to recovery, I’d like to extend a special invitation to you.
On November 3rd, United Intentions and Jammin Planet are hosting an event at The Florida Hotel & Conference Center in sunny Orlando, FL to honor the doctors and natural practitioners who not only saved my life but the lives of many others by sharing their vast knowledge of how to naturally treat and beat cancer.
Some of the doctors and health crusaders we’ll be honoring are Del Bigtree, Dr. Rashid Buttar, Dr. Joseph Mercola, Ty and Charlene Bollinger, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, plus many more.
These amazing doctors and practitioners are world renowned for helping others that have been diagnosed with or have been dealing with cancer, heal themselves… naturally.
This is going to be such an amazing event and I hope you will join us in honoring them by attending the Doctors Who Rock Awards.
If you haven’t saved your seat yet, click the link below to make sure you don’t miss this wonderful opportunity to honor mine and your health heros.
Hope to see you there,
P.S. The Doctors Who Rock Awards event begins on November 3rd at 5:30pm- 10:00pm.
Join us at this incredible event and help us honor those that continue to help save lives.
Hi, Cancer information from Women support programs! posted Oct 10/17
I’m really impressed by all of the wonderful and supportive information
you’ve shared on your site for those suffering from cancer (and for those
who love someone who is). This is obviously a topic close to me, so I’m
sending you additional resources I hope you’ll consider adding to this
Preparing for the Death of a Terminally-Ill Loved One: What to Expect, and
How to Help the Entire Family Move Forward
Living with Cancer: Eight Things You Need to Know
Coping with a Child’s Illness While You’re in Recovery
Eating Well During and After Your Cancer Treatment
7 Side Effects of Cancer Treatment, and How to Cope with Them
PTSD and Life After Cancer
How to Create a Peaceful At-Home Hospice for Your Loved One
I sincerely hope these help your cause, and if there is anything else I can
do to support it, please let me know.
Helen Carter – firstname.lastname@example.org
HANS Health Action Network speak on health freedom! Posted Oct 10/17
This September 28, 2017 CBC News article (3 minute read), “659 elementary school students in Windsor area suspended for incomplete immunization records”, reports on the Ontario mandate to temporarily suspend students if their immunization records are not up to set standards.
For those who are concerned with the safety of current vaccination programs in Canada, this information will not be new but it will be an important confirmation.
Regardless of how you feel about vaccines, Health Action Network Society believes having them or not is a personal choice – a matter of health freedom.
According to Health Canada, Immunization is NOT Mandatory in Canada:
“Unlike some countries, immunization is not mandatory in Canada; it cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution.
Only three provinces have legislation or regulations under their health-protection acts to require proof of immunization for school entrance. Ontario and New Brunswick require proof for diphtheria, tetanus, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella immunization. In Manitoba, only measles vaccination is covered.
It must be emphasized that, in these three provinces, exceptions are permitted on medical or religious grounds and reasons of conscience; legislation and regulations must not be interpreted to imply compulsory immunization.”
Immunization in Canada – Volume: 23S4 – May 1997 — Canadian National Report on Immunization, 1996 Health Canada Website
The type of bullying demonstrated by the Windsor-Essex County Health Unit must NOT be tolerated. What can you do to preserve your health freedom and informed choice? Understand your rights and help make others aware that vaccines are not mandatory in Canada. If you live in Ontario or New Brunswick, and choose to have your child exempted from vaccines, you can find legal exemption forms at the Vaccine Choice Canada website. Write your local MP to let them know you expect them to help preserve your health freedom. Most importantly, become aware of what’s really at stake. Sign up for news bulletins from organizations like Vaccine Choice Canada and the NHHPA
The Rockefellers and Rothschilds are involved with GMOs due to their fascination with eugenics, which is the science of population control through selective breeding and sterilization. […]
G2Voice Broadcast #56: Why the Flu shot is ineffective and dangerous to allow into the body! posted Oct 6/17
Tune in Sunday October 8th at www.g2voice.is
Genesis II Church Seminar in Colombia
Spanish Seminar October 14th – 15th
Two weeks away from our
Genesis II Church Spanish Colombian Seminar!
Sign up and come to learn how to “take control of your OWN health” and enjoy beautiful Colombia!
We are looking forward to training more health ministers how to use the G2 Sacramental Protocols. We are now seeing so many testimonies coming in monthly. People can take control of the their own health without relying on the medical industry for the rest of their life! Of course, in case of an emergency you need a hospital’s emergency ward, but day to day health can be achieved by:
• Detoxing the body with the G2 Sacraments of pathogens i.e. bad bacterias, bad viruses, bad over grown fungi and molds, overgrown parasite population, heavy metals, cancers and oxidize other synthetic and artificial compounds causing dis-ease in the body!
• Minimizing the toxins that are coming into the body.
• Building up the body’s internal complex and efficient defense systems that work in conjunction with the 12 systems of the body with naturally organic foods.
Everyone that is planning on coming needs to buy their plane tickets to Santa Marta, Colombia. Rodadero, where the seminar will be held, is 20 minutes from Airport, (SMR).
NOTE: Please register as soon as possible because this helps us to plan the seminar to run more efficiently.
Contact Bishop Joseph at: email@example.com
Genesis II Church Seminar #55
Only 7 people but the best 7!
We had a small group of 7 come to learn the Genesis II Church Sacramental Protocols and how to teach a G2 Seminar! One is going to teach the information in German, another in Spanish and all wanted to know how to start a Genesis II Church Chapter in their prospective country. This is how the Genesis II Church is going to grow exponentially!
Even the Bible taught the early Christians to find “faithful” people that could train others and train them first! We can only help those that are seeking the TRUTH!
2 Timothy 2:1-3 King James Version (KJV)
1 Thou therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus.
2 And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.
3 Thou therefore endure hardness, as a good soldier of Jesus Christ
Picture says it all!
Why the Flu shot is ineffective and dangerous to allow to the body!
Well, it is “Flu Season” and you will hear on the news the “flu vaccine” is important to receive to help protect the body from getting the “flu”. Is this advice a good idea or is this another “marketing technique” by the producers of this yearly vaccine? Is the “flu vaccine” dangerous? What is in this vaccine? Does receiving the “flu vaccine” do more damage than good? Is it “safe and effective”?
Please listen to the following vidoes about the “Flu Vaccine” and its dangers. There is other information below if you want to look into it further. This is worth checking out! The Flu shot is not stopping the “flu” and the ingredients are toxic to the body especially to older people and the very young! As a whole the elderly have compromised immune sytems already due to years of taking medications and eating processed foods! The VERY young have NOT “acquired” natural immunity or have a developed immune system so they are very vunerable to toxins!
To read the whole newsletter please click the link below http://mmsnews.is/mms-newsletters/432-g2voice-broadcast-56-why-the-flu-shot-is-ineffective-and-dangerous-to-allow-into-the-body-10-05-2017
Let’s change the world together!
Archbishop Mark S. Grenon
MMS Saves Lives.
The best and worst forms of magnesium to take as a supplement posted Oct 5/17
For this reason, an increasing number of people are turning to magnesium supplements to boost their intake of this vital nutrient. However, since magnesium must be bound to another substance before it can be adequately absorbed, magnesium supplements come in a number of different forms that provide different, or targeted, health benefits. This article takes a closer look at the best (and worst) forms of magnesium on the market today.
The best forms of magnesium
Magnesium citrate — Magnesium citrate is the most popular magnesium supplement, probably because it is inexpensive and easily absorbed. Since citric acid is a mild laxative, magnesium citrate functions as a constipation aid as well as a magnesium source. It is a great choice for individuals with rectal or colon problems but is unsuitable for those with loose bowel movements.
Magnesium taurate — Magnesium taurate is the best choice of magnesium supplement for people with cardiovascular issues, since it is known to prevent arrhythmias and guard the heart from damage caused by heart attacks. Magnesium taurate is easily absorbed (magnesium and taurine stabilize cell membranes together), and it contains no laxative properties.
Magnesium malate — Magnesium malate is a fantastic choice for people suffering from fatigue, since malic acid — a natural fruit acid present in most cells in the body — is a vital component of enzymes that play a key role in ATP synthesis and energy production. Since the ionic bonds of magnesium and malic acid are easily broken, magnesium malate is also highly soluble.
Magnesium glycinate — Magnesium glycinate (magnesium bound with glycine, a non-essential amino acid) is one of the most bioavailable and absorbable forms of magnesium, and also the least likely to induce diarrhea. It is the safest option for correcting a long-term deficiency.
Magnesium chloride — Though magnesium chloride only contains around 12 percent elemental magnesium, it has an impressive absorption rate and is the best form of magnesium to take for detoxing the cells and tissues. Moreover, chloride (not to be confused with chlorine, the toxic gas) aids kidney function and can boost a sluggish metabolism.
Magnesium carbonate — Magnesium carbonate is another popular, bioavailable form of magnesium that actually turns into magnesium chloride when it mixes with the hydrochloric acid in our stomachs. It is a good choice for people suffering from indigestion and acid reflux, since it contains antacid properties.
The worst forms of magnesium
Magnesium oxide — Magnesium oxide is the most common form of magnesium sold in pharmacies, but it is non-chelated and possesses a poor absorption rate compared to those listed above.
Magnesium sulfate — Magnesium sulfate, also called Epsom salt, is a fantastic constipation aid but an unsafe source of dietary magnesium, since overdosing on it is easy.
Magnesium glutamate and aspartate — Avoid these two forms of magnesium completely. Glutamic acid and aspartic acid are components of the dangerous artificial sweetener aspartame, and both of them become neurotoxic when unbound to other amino acids.
Sources for this article include:
About the author:
Michael Ravensthorpe is an independent writer whose research interests include nutrition, alternative medicine, and bushcraft. He is the creator of the website, Spiritfoods, through which he promotes the world’s healthiest foods.
- Red Algae & Seawater Derived
- From Cool, Clean, Pristine Iceland Arctic Waters
- 72 Trace Minerals
- Super Concentrated 500 mg Per Serving
Rebecca Bredow, a mother, has been given two weeks to get her nine-year old son caught up on his vaccines or she will be jailed. […]
The Toxic Science of Flu Vaccines posted Oct 3/17
Inge’s Added Comment”
With the “Propaganda Buzz‘ in high gear once again to persuade EVERYONE , including infants and pregnant women, to “get their annual ‘free’ FLU shot” , you might find this article interesting with information that should make one think twice before becoming a pin-cushion once again for this Big Pharma Money Maker – paid for by taxpayer dollars — that is us!.
You might also find it interesting that pregnant women who receive the flu shot have a 7 fold increased incidence of miscarriage in the first trimester following a flu vaccination, and neurological developmental damage in the surviving fetuses. No research was ever done on the “safety” for infants or pregnant women before this was recommended.
Let’s remember the that flu shot still contains MERCURY as part of its toxic concoction – even though it has been solidly established that MERCURY is not safe IN ANY quantity, and is always associated with neurological damage when injected .
What insanity is being endorsed, mandated and tolerated to increase the “profit potential” by increasing the “client base” for Big Pharma’s toxic products.
Hope you pass this article on to people that you know will be “lining up for their ‘free’ SHOT”, in a state of gullible ignorance.
If we want this insanity to be stop, it is up to us to do the educating, to enable others to make wise, informed choices .
The Toxic Science of Flu Vaccines
The flu shot does not discriminate: children, the elderly, and everyone in between can suffer detrimental effects from this dangerous vaccine.
Progressive Radio Network, October 31, 2016 PRN
Joshua Hadfield was a normal, healthy developing child as a toddler. In the midst of the 2010 H1N1 swine flu frenzy and fear mongering about the horrible consequences children face if left unvaccinated, the Hadfield’s had Joshua vaccinated with Glaxo’s Pandermrix influenza vaccine. Within weeks, Joshua could barely wake up, sleeping up to nineteen hours a day. Laughter would trigger seizures.
Joshua was diagnosed with narcolepsy, “an incurable, debilitating condition” associated with acute brain damage. Today we can look back at Pandermrix as a horrible vaccine. Research indicates that it was associated with a 1400% increase in narcolepsy risk. More recently, a team of Finnish scientists at Finland’s National Institute for Health and Welfare, recorded 800 cases of narcolepsy associated with this vaccine. Vaccine ingredients other than the engineered viral antigen are most often believed to be the primary culprits to adverse vaccine reactions. The Finnish research, on the other hand, indicated that the vaccine’s altered viral nucleotide likely contributed to the sudden rise in sleeping sickness.
Although Pandermrix was pulled from the market, it should never have been approved and released in the first place. This is a classic case of regulatory negligence by health officials and the WHO which promulgates flu vaccines around the world. Like all vaccines, which are now commonly fast tracked through government health regulatory bodies for rapid release upon the public, it should have been tested more thoroughly and more rigorously reviewed.
Since the time of Edward Jenner’s primitive inoculation experiments to combat smallpox, and its countless aftermath of deaths throughout the 19th century, modern vaccine science has failed to learn its lessons. The failure of proper regulatory oversight has resulted in Joshua and other British citizens becoming disabled for life. The British government has paid out over 63 million pounds to cover lawsuits to Pandermrix victims. Glaxo has never admitted its flu vaccine caused brain damage. And this begs the question as to why it was withdrawn since it was the corporation’s single flagship vaccine against the swine flu.
We shouldn’t become complacent by assuming flu vaccine risks only affect young children. Sarah Behie was 20 years old after receiving the flu shot. Three weeks later her health deteriorated dramatically. Diagnosed with Guillain-Barre syndrome, a not uncommon adverse effect of influenza vaccination, four years later Sarah remains paralyzed from the waist down, incapable of dressing and feeding herself, and rotting away in hospitals and nursing homes.
Joshua’s and Sarah’s stories are by no means unique. Today tens of thousands of infants, toddlers, children and adults across the nation are increasingly becoming victims of vaccine injuries. No national debate is initiated because regulatory malfeasance within federal health agencies has aligned its self interests with pharmaceutical profits rather than serving the public health.
Flu vaccines are perhaps the most ineffective vaccine on the market. Repeatedly we are told by health officials that the moral argument for its continued use is for “the greater good,” although this imaginary good has never been defined scientifically. For the present 2016 flu season, the CDC has removed Medimmune’s live attenuated flu vaccine (LAIV) FluMist from the market because it was found to be ineffective. Or at least this is the rationale stated by the agency. According to the CDC, one third of children’s influenza vaccinations are with live nasal sprays. Yet regardless of how infective and useless FluMist has been, it has remained on the market since 2003, and in 2014 the CDC recommended it as its flu vaccine of choice for children.
Although last year FluMist was only 3% effective, according to an NBC report, the real truth behind its withdrawal is likely more crucial.  There is no reason to doubt that the vaccine contributed to more cases of flu infection than it prevented. And this is a fundamental flaw with all live vaccines, and even killed attenuated ones, that have been shown to “shed” and infect people in contact with the vaccinated persons, especially those with compromised immune systems.
In her investigative report, “The Emerging Risks of Live Virus and Virus Vectored Vaccines,” Barbara Lo Fisher notes that the attenuated virus in the flu vaccine can shed and infect others for months after vaccination. Both the unvaccinated and the vaccinated are at risk. The CDC acknowledges this risk and warns
“Persons who care for severely immunosuppressed persons who require a protective environment should not receive LAIV, or should avoid contact with such persons for 7 days after receipt, given the theoretical risk for transmission of the live attenuated vaccine virus.”
At their best, flu vaccines remain around 50-60% effective according to official health statements. However, the World Health Organization’s predictions for 2014-2015 flu strains were a bust. The match was such a failure that the CDC was forced to warn the American public that the vaccine was only 23% effective. Given that the 2012-2013 flu season was only 27% effective for the 65 years-plus age group, predictive methodologies to determine which flu strains emerge during any given influenza season have more in common with medieval divination than sound science. For the 1992-1993 and 1997-1998 seasons, the vaccine concoction of flu strains was only 16% effective. Katherine Severyn, who monitors the actual WHO predictions and compares them with CDC claims has stated that, “depending upon the study cited, [flu] vaccine efficacy actually ranges from a low of 0%.” 
Dr. David Brownstein has noted that as far back as 1999, the Journal of the American Medical Association reported increased risks of febrile disorders greater than placebo associated with the live vaccine. According to the FDA’s literature on FluMist, the vaccine was not studied for immunocompromised individuals (yet was still administered to them), and has been associated with acute allergic reactions, asthma, Guillian-Barre, and a high rate of hospitalizations among children under 24 months – largely due to upper respiratory tract infections. Other adverse effects include pericarditis, congenital and genetic disorders, mitochondrial encephalomyopathy or Leigh Syndrome, meningitis, and others. Given this litany of vaccine dangers, it is highly unlikely the vaccine was removed simply for ineffectiveness. Yet when has the CDC ever been truthful with the public?
The development and promotion of the influenza vaccine was never completely about protecting the public. It has been the least popular vaccine in the US including among healthcare workers. Instead, similar to the mumps vaccine in the MMR, it has been the cash cow for vaccine makers. Determining the actual severity of any given flu season is burdened by federal intentional confusion to mislead the public. The CDC’s first line of propaganda defense to enforce flu vaccinations is to exaggerate flu infections as the cause of preventable deaths. However, validating this claim is near impossible because the CDC does not differentiate deaths caused by influenza infection and deaths due to pneumonia. On its website, the CDC lumps flu and pneumonia deaths together, currently estimated at 55,227. The large majority of these were pneumonia deaths of elderly patients. Yet in any given year, only 3-18% of suspected influenza infections actually test positive for a Type A or B influenza strain.
Dr. Martin Meltzer, a CDC expert in health economics, has stated “almost nobody dies of the flu” and “deaths [are] associated with flu, but not necessarily caused by flu.”
To date there is only one gold standard clinical trial with the flu vaccine that compares vaccinated vs. unvaccinated, and it is not good news for the CDC and the vaccine makers.
This Hong Kong funded double-blind placebo controlled study following the health conditions of vaccinated and unvaccinated children between the ages of 6-15 years for 272 days. The trial concluded the flu vaccine holds no health benefits. In fact, those vaccinated with the flu virus were observed to have a 550% higher risk of contracting non-flu virus respiratory infections. Among the vaccinated children, there were 116 flu cases compared to 88 among the unvaccinated; there were 487 other non-influenza virus infections, including rhinovirus, coxsackie, echovirus and others, among the vaccinated versus 88 with the unvaccinated.
This single study alone poses a scientifically sound warning and rationale for avoiding the vaccine.
It is worth noting that there are approximately 200 distinct viruses that are misdiagnosed as influenza and produce flu-like symptoms. These organisms don’t magically appear during fall and winter – they are always with us. Nevertheless we are more susceptible to flu-like infections during the colder months when there are less daylight hours.
In a later study by Dr. Danuta Skowronski in Canada, individuals with a history of receiving consecutive seasonal flu shots over several years had an increased risk of becoming infected with H1N1 swine flu. Skowronski commented on his findings that
“policy makers have not yet had a chance to fully digest them [the study’s conclusions] or understand the implications.”
“Who knows, frankly? The wise man knows he knows nothing when it comes to influenza, so you always have to be cautious in speculating.”
There is strong evidence suggesting that all vaccine clinical trials carried out by manufacturers fall short of demonstrating vaccine efficacy accurately. And when they are shown to be efficacious, it is frequently in the short term and offer only partial or temporary protection. According to an article in the peer-reviewed Journal of Infectious Diseases, the only way to evaluate vaccines is to scrutinize the epidemiological data obtained from real-life conditions. In other words, researchers simply cannot — or will not — adequately test a vaccine’s effectiveness and immunogenicity prior to its release onto an unsuspecting public.
The Cochrane Collaboration, the world’s foremost group of unbiased researchers, physicians and scientists, has performed a series of meta-analyses on the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine. In 2014 they found that vaccinating adults against influenza did not affect the number of people hospitalized nor decrease lost work. Cochrane researchers stated that their results might be overly optimistic due to the fact that 24 out of 90 studies were funded by the vaccine manufacturers, which tend to produce results favorable to their product.
According to Dr. Tom Jefferson at the Cochrane Collaboration, it makes little sense to keep vaccinating against seasonal influenza based on the evidence.
Jefferson has also endorsed more cost-effective and scientifically-proven means of minimizing the transmission of flu, including regular hand washing and wearing masks. There is also substantial peer-reviewed literature supporting the supplementation of Vitamin D.
Dr. Jefferson’s conclusions are backed by a 2013 article by Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine scientist Peter Doshi, PhD, in the British Journal of Medicine. In his article Doshi questions the flu vaccine paradigm stating:
“Closer examination of influenza vaccine policies shows that although proponents employ the rhetoric of science, the studies underlying the policy are often of low quality, and do not substantiate officials’ claims. The vaccine might be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and the threat of influenza appears overstated.”
The CDC currently recommends that elderly Americans receive a flu shot, stating that
“[v]accination is especially important for people 65 years and older because they are at high risk for complications from flu.”
Unfortunately, this warning is grossly unfounded. A significant body of research proves that receiving the flu shot does not reduce mortality among seniors. One particularly compelling 2005 study was carried out by scientists at the federal National Institutes of Health (NIH) and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). Not only did the study indicate that the flu vaccine did nothing to prevent deaths from influenza among seniors, but that flu mortality rates increased as a greater percentage of seniors received the shot.
After the release of the study, investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson covered the findings in a CBS News segment. Attkisson interviewed the only co-author of the study who was not affiliated with the NIH, Dr. Tom Reichert, who stated that the research team revisited the data several times, but that no matter how they analyzed the “incendiary material”, the conclusion was clear: flu shots don’t improve mortality rates in the elderly population.
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny reviewed the Cochrane Database reviews on the flu vaccine’s efficacy. In a review of 51 studies involving over 294,000 children, there was
“no evidence that injecting children 6-24 months of age with a flu shot was any more effective than placebo. In children over 2 years of age, flu vaccine effectiveness was 33 percent of the time preventing flu. In children with asthma, inactivated flu vaccine did not prevent influenza related hospitalizations in children. The database shows that children who received the flu vaccine were at a higher risk of hospitalization than children who did not receive the vaccine.
In a separate study involving 400 children with asthma receiving a flu vaccine and 400 who were not immunized, there was no difference in the number of clinic and emergency room visits and hospitalizations between the two groups.
In 64 studies involving 66,000 adults, “Vaccination of healthy adults only reduced risk of influenza by 6 percent and reduced the number of missed work days by less than one day. There was change in the number of hospitalizations compared to the non-vaccinated. In further studies of elderly adults residing in nursing homes over the course of several flu seasons, flu vaccinations were insignificant for preventing infection.
During every annual quarter, the CDC’s Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines meets, and the Department of Justice releases its report on settlements made for vaccine injuries and deaths. In recent years, the flu vaccine has topped the charts. During its most recent release in June 2016, 85 of the 116 cases, and 2 of the 3 deaths, settled by the “vaccine court” over a three month period were associated with the flu vaccine. While this might appear to be a small and insignificant number compared to the millions of vaccines administered, it bears noting that the CDC itself admits that only 10% of vaccine adverse effects go reported. Independent analysis indicates it may be as small as 1-2% at best.
For almost a decade, the CDC has known influenza vaccines are ineffective and life-threatening for the elderly but continues to market them without hesitation. Hence in November 2014, five senior citizens at an assisted living facility in Dacula, Georgia, died within week after all residents were vaccinated.
During the previous year’s flu vaccine trials, Sanofi Pasteur’s Fluzone killed 23 elderly participants during the vaccine trial. Nevertheless, the vaccine was approved and continues to be marketed towards senior citizens.
Today, the most extreme wing of the pro-vaccine community, headed by Paul Offit at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, have been diligently pursuing mandatory vaccination and encouraging states to repeal personal religious and philosophical exemption from vaccinating. During the flu season, the debate over mandatory vaccination becomes most heated as medical facilities and government departments attempt to threaten employees and schools who refuse vaccination. Although this is deeply worrisome to those who advocate their Constitutional rights to freedom of choice in their healthcare, there are respectable groups opposing mandatory flu shots. Among them are the American Medical Association and the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.
According to the statement of the latter, the Association
“objects strenuously to any coercion of healthcare personnel to receive influenza immunization. It is a fundamental human right not to be subjected to medical interventions without fully informed consent.”
The American Medical Association statement recognizes “philosophic reason” as a valid means for exemption. In addition, many union organizations, such as National Nurses United, the American Federation of Teachers, and the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions now oppose mandatory flu shots. What these organizations recognize and is categorically denied by the Paul Offits in the pro-vaccine cabal, is the hard science raising serious questions over the flu vaccine’s efficacy and safety that doesn’t justify a national mandate.
The good news is that Americans are rapidly losing confidence in the CDC. According to National Consumers League poll, over two-thirds of Americans believe vaccines cause autism, which the CDC categorically denies.
Almost two months after the media reported on the revelations by a CDC whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson, who exposed the CDC cover up of a vaccine-autism connection with the MMR vaccine, a CBS News poll showed public approval of the CDC nosedived to 37%, down from 60% the previous year. Vaccine apologists and the major media claim this large decrease is due to the CDC’s dismal handling of the Ebola crisis; however, Thompson’s whistleblowing received over 750 million Twitter impressions indicating that the debate over vaccine efficacy and safety is far more on the public’s mind.
Positive endorsement of the CDC would plummet further if the public knew the full extent of CDC officials lying to Congress and their conspiracy to commit medical fraud for over a dozen years.
Imagine the tens of thousands of children and families who would have been saved from life-long neurological damage and immeasurable suffering if the CDC was not indebted to protecting the toxic products of the pharmaceutical industry and was serving the health and well-being of American children?
And we can begin to further dismantle this citadel of despotic medical fascism by simply refusing the flu vaccine and protecting ourselves by adopting a healthier lifestyle during the flu season.
Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and a former Senior Research Analyst in the biotechnology and genomic industries.
Dr. Gary Null is the host of the nation’s longest running public radio program on nutrition and natural health and a multi-award-winning documentary film director, including Autism: Made in the USA, War on Health: The FDA’s Cult of Tyranny and Silent Epidemic: The Untold Story of Vaccination.
Gary Null is an internationally recognized thought leader and activist who holds a Ph.D. in human nutrition and public health science and Richard Gall is the Executive Producer for the Progressive Radio Network.
For more information on the detrimental effects of the Influenza Vaccination, visit the Greenmedinfo.com Research Dashboard.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.
All articles by Gary Null, PhD and Richard Gale
 Barbara Lo Fisher, The Emerging Risks of Live Virus and Virus Vectored Vaccines. National Vaccine Info Center, 2014
 Barbara Lo Fisher, op cit.
 Richard Gale and Gary Null, “Flu Vaccines: Are They Effective and Safe?” Progressive Radio Network, Sept. 28, 2009
 Barbara Lo Fisher, “CDC Admits Flu Shots Fail Half the Time.” NVIC, October 19, 2016
 Manning, Anita. “Study: Annual flu death toll could be overstated.” USA Today. December 11, 2005.
Miachela Rectenwald NYU
 Weinberg, Geoffrey A., and Peter G. Szilagyi. “Vaccine Epidemiology: Efficacy, Effectiveness, and the Translational Research Roadmap.” The Journal of Infectious Diseases J INFECT DIS 201.11 (2010): 1607-610. Web.
 Jefferson T et al. Vaccines for Preventing Influenza in Healthy Adults. Cochrane Database of Systemic Review, 2010. Issue 7. Art No. CD001269
 ‘A Whole Industry Is Waiting For A Pandemic’, Der Spiegel, http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,637119-2,00.html, accessed December 4, 2011
 Doshi, P. “Influenza: Marketing Vaccine by Marketing Disease.” BMJ 346 (2013): F3037. Accessed November 30, 2015. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3037.
 “What You Should Know and Do this Flu Season If You Are 65 Years and Older” http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/65over.htm
 Simonsen, Lone, Reichert, Thomas, et al. . “Impact of Influenza Vaccination on Seasonal Mortality in the US Elderly Population.” Arch Intern Med Archives of Internal Medicine 165, no. 3 (2005): 265. Accessed December 1, 2015. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.3.265.
 Glezen, W P., and Lone Simonsen. “Commentary: Benefits of Influenza Vaccine in US Elderly–new Studies Raise Questions.” International Journal of Epidemiology 35, no. 2 (2006): 352-53. Accessed December 1, 2015. doi:10.1093/ije/dyi293.
 “Govt. Researchers: Flu Shots Not Effective in Elderly, After All” https://sharylattkisson.com/govt-researchers-flu-shots-not-effective-in-elderly-after-all/
 105th International Conference of the American Thoracic Sociey, May 15-20, 2009 (quoted in , Sherri. “The Truth about Flu Shots”. Idaho Observer, June 1, 2009)
 Tenpenny, Sherri. “The Truth about Flu Shots”. Idaho Observer, June 1, 2009.